South Carolina Episcopalians
Bearing Witness to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ through the Episcopal Church
Welcome to Our Home Page!
FAQs on Bishop Lawrence, Quitclaim Deeds, and more... read more
Steve Skardon
Editor
Contact us with comments
& suggestions
Chronology
of Rebellion
in the Diocese of South Carolina
click here
Our Opinion: 2009 All Saints' Ruling is limited to All Saints'
click here
Frequently Asked
Questions
click here
Title IV is no threat to the Diocese of SC
click here
Our Opinion:
Reconvening
the 2010 Diocesan Convention
was illegal
click here
Links
The Episcopal Forum of
South Carolina
click
The Diocese of South Carolina
click
The Diocese of Upper South Carolina
1
Reports are listed chronologically with the most recent at the top. Scroll down to view older reports.
OPINION: Why AMiA Dissidents & Rwanda's Anglicans Really Split Up
(January 12, 2012) Full story
NEW! Va. Court says the Episcopal Church has a Legal Interest in all Parish Properties (January 11, 2012)
Diocese of Virginia: “Our goal [is] to return faithful Episcopalians to their church homes and Episcopal properties to the mission of the Church"
In another warning to rebellious parishes in South Carolina, CANA must turn over disputed parish property to The Episcopal Church
Click here to read full story and the Court's opinion
Diocesan Meltdown Part 19:
NEW! Rebellious Parishes Needlessly Inviting Lawsuits over Church Property (January 9, 2012)
New legal opinion suggests reliance on All Saints' case to hold on to Church property will lead to complicated legal entanglements
Our Diocese changed its name in October 2010, signaling that it is something separate from the Episcopal Church
A number of parishes in the Diocese of South Carolina are taking steps to change their corporate documents in ways they think will allow them to walk away from the Episcopal Church with property that, in some cases, has belonged to the Church since colonial times.
According to an opinion by Charleston attorney Melinda Lucka, these parishes would be acting on a misinterpretation of a 2009 state Supreme Court ruling in the case of All Saints' on Pawley's Island.
Reliance on this ruling could very lead to expensive legal entanglements, if recent history in other dioceses is an indicator.
In that case, All Saints' congregation voted to leave the Episcopal Church and join a missionary effort affiliated with the ultra-conservative Anglican Province of Rwanda. The Court allowed the breakaway group to retain the parish property, based largely on a 1902 rechartering and a 1903 quit-claim deed granted to the parish by the Diocese. Through the deed, the Diocese relinquished any legal claim it might have had in the parish's property.
The Episcopal Church is considered by courts to be "hierarchical", meaning that parish properties are held "in trust" for congregations by their dioceses, which are constituted by their national Church. The Court held that the trust relationship was invalidated in All Saints' case by the Diocese's recording of the quit-claim deed.
Read the full opinion here
Congregations acting without understanding the implications. Beginning this month, a several congregations will be convening parish meetings to consider their future in response to urgings from the leadership of the Diocese.
The Diocese maintains that, thanks to the Court ruling in the All Saints' case and the recording of quitclaim deeds recently issued by the Diocese, they are free to choose a new path forward, independent from the Episcopal Church.
For example, parishes like St. Paul's, Summerville are asking parishioners if they want their vestries to delete all references to accession to the Constitution and Canons of the Episcopal Church. St. Paul's, Conway asked its congregants if they wanted their vestry to delete references to the Constitution and Canons of both the Episcopal Church and the Diocese (they did). Trinity on Edisto Island simply announced to its members that they will be amending its corporate documents in ways that were not specified at an upcoming parish meeting.
All of this activity has credibility because it is being encouraged by the leadership of the Diocese, which formally amended its corporate documents in October 2010, renaming itself an "Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina" as opposed to "a Diocese in the Episcopal Church."
SC Episcopalians has discovered that many lay people are being told they must choose to affiliate with either the Diocese of South Carolina or the Episcopal Church, but not both. In fact, there is no reason for any parish to take any action --- an option that doesn't seem to be getting communicated to the laity.
In her opinion, Ms. Lucka argues that the Diocese is wrongfully assuming that the Supreme Court invalidated the property interests of the Episcopal Church in all of its parishes in South Carolina. In the case of All Saints', she argues, the Court did invalidate those interests, but only in the unique circumstances of that parish.
The Diocese's contention that the ruling applies to every Episcopal Church parish in South Carolina is, in the opinion of SC Episcopalians, a leap that would be daunting even to the Flying Walendas.
Diocese's interpretation of All Saints' ruling highly questionable. The Diocese's expansive view of the All Saints' case has been rejected repeatedly by Federal and state courts throughout the country. Courts in Georgia and Virginia are the most recent to reject it.
Lawsuits against parishes in this diocese eventually would be appealed to higher courts, where validation of this hijacking of Church assets has little chance of succeeding.
If the Diocese's view is valid, it would apply to every parish in the Upper Diocese as well as to the Methodists, Presbyterians, and every other "hierarchical church" in the state. So far, none of them have taken any actions similar to those being encouraged by our Diocese, nor do they have any plans to do so.
++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 18:
"Clarifying Conversation" between Southern Bishops and Lawrence Yields Nothing (December 15, 2011)
Bishops from North Carolina, Georgia, and Upper SC getting it that Bishop Lawrence is not trying to stay in the Episcopal Church
Diocesan Meltdown Part 17:
NEW! Standing Committee, Canon Harmon Inject Themselves into Bishops' Meeting (December 9, 2011)
Hostile tone in letter to Bishop Daniel reflects delusional nature of Diocesan leadership
Canon Harmon claims Bishops' meeting request was "pastorally destructive" and "dripping with hypocrisy"
The Diocese of South Carolina continued its sputtering defense of itself from imagined attacks by the Episcopal Church over the weekend. This time it's the Standing Committee attempting to disrupt yet another sane and responsible attempt by the Episcopal Church to figure out what the Diocese wants.
Read this letter for yourself
++++
AMiA Bishops, Anglican Province of Rwanda Split (December 6, 2011)
The Anglican Mission in America, one of the original dissident groups to separate from the Episcopal Church over a decade ago, has in effect severed its ties to the Anglican Province of Rwanda following the resignations of most of its American bishops.
Last week Rwandan Primate Archbishop Onesphore Rwaj gave an ultimatum to AMiA leader, Bishop Chuck Murphy, to either resign or recant for statements and actions the Province's House of Bishops perceived to be offensive.
Murphy and almost all of the other American missionary bishops consecrated by the Rwandans effectively resigned their positions today by failing to renew their commitment to the Province.
Murphy was the rector of All Saints', Pawleys Island when the parish initially attempted to leave the Episcopal Church with its property. AMiA is still headquartered in Pawleys Island. read more
++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 16:
NEW! Lawrence will meet with Fellow Bishops for "Clarifying Conversation" on Property Issues (December 6, 2012)
"We have had no direct communication with you," East Carolina Bishop complains;
Previous attempts to engage Lawrence have largely been met with frustration
SC Bishop Mark Lawrence has agreed to meet with a representation of his fellow bishops from Province IV who requested a "clarifying conversation" about his recent execution of legal documents relinquishing the Diocese's interest in millions of dollars in Episcopal Church property.
Lawrence will meet with as yet unnamed bishops on December 14th as part of a visit that apparently will include a presentation prepared by the Standing Committee.
The Rt. Rev. Clifton Daniel of the Diocese of East Carolina made the request to Bishop Lawrence Monday on behalf of their colleagues in dioceses as far west as Louisiana, as far north as Kentucky and as far south as Florida.
Read the letter from Bishop Daniel
Bishop Daniel's request grew our of a meeting of the Province's bishops last week, which Lawrence had apparently skipped out on.
Daniel's letter said that the Province's bishops had “determined that it is our duty as bishops of this province to address these concerns in direct communication with you, as Jesus exhorts his followers in Matthew’s Gospel (18:15-20), and in accord with our ordination vows regarding the unity and governance of the church.”
Since 2008 when he first became bishop, members of the House of Bishops have made numerous attempts engage him in meaningful dialogue about his self-described "war" with the Episcopal Church, but little came from those opportunities.
Shortly after her election, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori made a personal visit to South Carolina to "listen" to the concerns of the Bishop and Diocesan clergy, but was famously treated with public rudeness and disrespect, all apparently with Lawrence's assent.
Diocesan Meltdown Part 15:
NEW! Lawrence Matter Far from Settled
(December 1, 2011)
Disciplinary Board needed documents the
Diocese wouldn't provide
Critics say disciplinary process needs to be strengthened to rein in rebellious bishops
The failure of the Episcopal Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops to certify that SC Bishop Mark Lawrence has not "abandoned communion" was not exactly a ringing endorsement of his leadership, SC Episcopalians has determined.
In his statement announcing the Board's decision last week, retired Bishop Dorsey Henderson stressed that the decision was made solely based on 63-pages of documents provided by communicants of the Diocese. Without the benefit of further investigation and documents withheld by the Diocese, a majority of the Board members felt they did not have enough to go on to certify "abandonment".
"Based on the information before it, the Board was unable to make the conclusions essential to a certification that Bishop Lawrence had abandoned the communion of the Church," Henderson said.
Two years ago, the Diocese reacted vociferously when a lawyer for the Episcopal Church's asked for Standing Committee minutes and other documents related the status of properties owned by certain parishes. A few months ago, an attorney for the Board similarly requested standing committee minutes, and was attacked by right-bloggers and others supportive of Bishop Lawrence. She eventually was forced to resign her position.
The Church's Disciplinary canon does not prohibit the DBB from revisiting any of the original complaints should additional material surface in the future. However, the Board does not have investigatory authority and it can not force the Diocese to cooperate.
The Church's disciplinary process also doesn't prohibit the consideration of new allegations, particularly those that might be associated with Lawrence's recent showering of parishes with legal documents relinquishing the Diocese's trust interest in their property. The DBB's recently concluded review did not include that issue.
Read reaction to the DBB decision in other dioceses
++++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 14:
NEW! Disciplinary Board says Evidence is Insufficient to Certify "Abandonment"
(November 28, 2011, revised 11/29/11)
Members wanted more documentation of Bishop Lawrence's support of rebellious actions
Recent action relinquishing Diocese's interests in parish property was not included in complaints reviewed
Recent complaints against SC Bishop Mark Lawrence do not rise to the level of "abandonment of communion" with the Episcopal Church, according to its Disciplinary Board for Bishops (DBB).
The astonishing finding, announced today by the Board's President Bishop Dorsey Henderson, left many in and out of the Diocese scratching their heads, as to its implications.
Among the complaints against Bishop Lawrence was his refusal to acknowledge the authority of the Episcopal Church, including its Constitution and Canons, and his open support for rebellious parishes leaving the Church with their properties.
According to a statement issued by Henderson, none of these actions rises to the level of "abandonment" nor apparently is a barrier to Lawrence's serving as a bishop in good standing in the Church. After Henderson's announcement, Bishop Lawrence took the occasion to remind the Diocese that he considered the Board to be illegally constituted and therefore had no real interest in whether it found his actions to be abandonment or not.
According to the Church’s newly revised disciplinary canon, “abandonment” means that a bishop has renounced its "doctrine, discipline, and worship” either by open expression, or by the performance of episcopal acts and/or unauthorized participation in religious entities not in communion with the Episcopal Church.
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 13
Ga. Supreme Court Rejects Pawleys Island Decision, 6-1; Shoots Down Ugandans' Claim to Savannah's Christ Church (November 21, 2011)
Read ENS Report
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 12
"SC Diocese Releases Property Claim"
The Post & Courier, Charleston SC (Nov. 21, 2011)
by Adam Parker Read full story
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 11
Lawrence Allies Scramble to Record Deeds; Prudent Parishes Wary of Implications
(November 20, 2011)
Prudent vestries should review full implications
of quitclaim deeds before accepting them
"For God will bring every deed into judgment, even those done in secret …” Ecclesiastes
CHARLESTON -- Several parishes aligned with Bishop Mark Lawrence scrambled to record quitclaim deeds they received from the Diocese last week, even as questions swirled about their legality and the impact they could have on parishes who accept them.
Once the deeds are accepted by the parish or recorded publicly, they can’t be taken back.
Among those reportedly going forward last week were St. James Episcopal Church on James Island, Christ Episcopal Church in Mount Pleasant, The Church of the Good Shepherd and Holy Trinity Episcopal Church in West Ashley, The Cathedral of St. Luke & St. Paul, St. John’s Episcopal Church on Johns Island, St. Helena's in Beaufort, Trinity Episcopal Church in Myrtle Beach, The Episcopal Church of the Resurrection in Surfside Beach, and the Church of the Cross in Bluffton.
While SC Episcopalians is not a source of legal advice, we are hearing that more prudent vestries are planning to inform the Diocese that they are not accepting the quitclaim deed... until their lawyers, bankers, and insurance brokers have had a chance to assess its implications.
Every parish is different, and apparently every quitclaim deed issued by the Diocese is not the same. One size does not fit all.
The deeds, mailed out to the parishes last week, would relinquish any claim the Diocese might have on parish property should they be found to be valid. They could be seen by a parish as removing a potential obstacle to leaving the Episcopal Church, or they could lead to expensive and protracted litigation.
+++++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 10
Lawrence Quietly Initiated Plan to Give Away Diocesan Property Claims Two Years Ago (November 18, 2011)
2010 Deal with Bluffton parish was kept under wraps until Wednesday
Attacks on the Episcopal Church and Presiding Bishop were a smokescreen
BLUFFTON -- All the while claiming he was being loyal the Episcopal Church, SC Bishop Mark Lawrence was facilitating a possible departure from the Episcopal Church by a large parish in Bluffton nearly two years ago.
Apparently Lawrence and Standing Committee Chairman Jeffrey Miller quietly executed a "quitclaim deed" in February 2010, relinquishing the Diocese's legal interest in property belonging to the Church of the Cross. The deed wasn't recorded until Wednesday of this week.
Public disclosure of the deed's existence would have tipped off the rest of the Diocese and the Episcopal Church to Lawrence's plan to issue similar deeds to every parish in the Diocese this week. The Diocese's interest in the Bluffton property could be worth several million dollars.
During the same period the deed was being executed, Lawrence was publicly indignant over protests by traditional Episcopalians in the Diocese, who claimed he had violated his consecration oath to remain loyal to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.
Also at that same time, Bishop Lawrence and the Rev. Mr. Miller were actually denouncing Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori because the Episcopal Church was asking to see minutes of Standing Committee meetings and other legal documents that would have exposed their dealings with the Bluffton parish and others.
SC Episcopalians has been unable to find any evidence that the Bishop or the Standing Committee ever disclosed his generous gift to the Bluffton parish at either Diocesan convention held since that time.
+++++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 9
Anti-Episcopal Church Group Releases
Letter It Claims is from SC Chancellor
(November 18, 2011)
The American Anglican Council, one of several factions attacking the Episcopal Church, released a letter it claims has been sent to parishes in the Diocese of South Carolina from its Chancellor explaining Bishop Lawrence's recent actions relinquishing Diocesan interest in parish property.
If the letter is authentic, it is the first communication Bishop Lawrence has attempted with lay people in the matter. The group claims it went to every parish.
Read it here
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 8
Diocese of South Carolina Relinquishes
Claim to Parishes' Properties
(November 16, 2011 9 a.m.)
Attacks on the Episcopal Church and Presiding Bishop have largely been a smokescreen
Bishop's latest move would make it easier for parishes to leave the Episcopal Church
SEABROOK ISLAND -- Relying on a questionable and untested state Supreme Court ruling, Bishop Mark Lawrence announced Tuesday night that he is providing every parish in the Diocese a legal deed, permanently relinquishing any interest the Diocese may hold in its parish property.
This action could remove a potential stumbling block to parishes wanting to leave the Episcopal Church with their church property. It could also create chaos in the Diocese and among parishes, since the legality of the deeds may be in question.
The secret scheme has been in the works for at least two years, while Lawrence and others created public distractions with attacks on the Episcopal Church and the Presiding Bishop.
Lawrence's most recent outrage will almost certainly force the hand of Episcopal Church leaders, who have largely ignored his erratic, anti-Church behavior since becoming bishop in early 2008.
In the past Lawrence has insisted that the Diocese of South Carolina is “sovereign,” and argued that the wider Episcopal Church has no legal interest in parish property in the Diocese.
In the view of anti-Church secessionists, the way is now clear for parishes to leave the Episcopal Church in much the same way as St. Andrew's in Mount Pleasant did last year with Lawrence's apparent blessing.
Lawrence announced this latest provocation at a three-day clergy conference at the Diocese's conference center on Seabrook Island. As is his style, Lawrence’s carefully-scripted presentation was delivered in a closed-door setting surrounded by clergy and others who are least likely to challenge him.
The mood at the conference was "militant", according to one participant. Many clergy described themselves as being “at war" with the Episcopal Church, which they see as "the enemy."
Other more level-headed participants said they felt a great deal of pressure not to object to what was clearly an event orchestrated to create support for the Bishop's decision. Most the more traditional parishes in the Diocese were not represented at the conference.
Lawrence's legal thinking appeared to be the work of a Beaufort attorney, not especially well-known for his expertise in Church law. The Diocese's lawyer, Chancellor Wade Logan, was absent as he has been at other Diocesan events in which the attorney from Beaufort seemed to be in charge.
How important is this? It could be very important.
In the Episcopal Church, all property is held in trust for the use of its parishes by the Church and the dioceses. It can be a fuzzy arrangement, but it brings legal protections, better management and maintenance, enhanced borrowing capacity, and continuity from one generation to the next, among other things.
However, in the past, Lawrence has taken the position that the Episcopal Church does not have any interest in parish property in the Diocese, a position that directly contradicts dozens of state and Federal decisions on this question. The action the Bishop announced Tuesday evening means that he is renouncing any legal interest the Diocese might have in that property as well.
In short he is saying, that parishes own their own property and can do whatever they'd like with it, including taking it with them if they want to leave the Episcopal Church.
In his way of thinking, the Episcopal Church has no say in what happens to the property.
What difference will this make? Initially, parish life will continue as it always has, but an impact eventually could be felt when it comes to parishes borrowing money, securing insurance, inheriting property, recruiting clergy, providing pensions and employee benefits, and attracting new members.
In addition, many parishes receive annual income to maintain their buildings from endowments left to them to further the work of the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina. It is not clear if parishes could continue to use this money to maintain buildings in which the Diocese no longer has a legal interest.
Is this legal? For the moment, the Bishop's position may be uniquely valid in South Carolina. However, it is doubtful that it will withstand a legal challenge.
Here's why:
Three years ago, the state's Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of All Saints, Pawleys Island that seemed to suggest that the Episcopal Church -- and any other similarly structured church organization like the Presbyterians and Methodists -- does not have a legal interest in parish property held in trust by the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina.
All Saint's was trying to break away from the Episcopal Church and join the Anglican Province of Rwanda, which it eventually was allowed to do.
Legal authorities and those familiar with the Court's thinking say that the ruling was specific to the unique nature of All Saint's case. However, the Diocese of South Carolina, under Bishop Lawrence, disagrees.
Critical to the Court's ruling in the All Saints' case was a "quitclaim" deed executed by the Diocese in 1903 relinquishing any legal interest it might have to All Saints' property.
The existence of that deed tipped the Court's view of property ownership in favor of All Saints' over that of the Episcopal Church and the Diocese.
Bishop Lawrence told the clergy Tuesday that he has quietly executed similar "quitclaim" deeds for each parish in the Diocese.
Unfortunately, Lawrence’s action almost guarantees protracted legal battles. The SC Court's ruling, under which Lawrence is acting, appears to have no authority beyond South Carolina.
However, to have it declared invalid will likely require a Court challenge and appeal.
Last night's announcement will almost certainly accelerate an ongoing review of Lawrence's conduct by the Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops. That review was initiated by communicants in the Diocese who believe that the cumulative effect of Lawrence’s four turbulent years as our bishop amounts to a renunciation of his oath of loyalty to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.
Bishop Lawrence's supporters expect that the quitclaim deeds will make it easier for parishes in the Diocese to leave the Episcopal Church. Many are hoping they will choose to affiliate with the anti-Episcopal Church organization known as "The Anglican Church of North America."
ACNA operates under the leadership of Lawrence's mentor, deposed Pittsburgh Bishop Robert Duncan and his "Vicar General" in the Carolinas, former Episcopal priest Steve Wood. ACNA is not affiliated with the Episcopal Church and not part of the Anglican Communion.
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 7
Diocese Still Stoking Unfounded Fears of Episcopal Church Plot (November 10, 2011)
Standing Committee Chairman promotes imaginary threat at clergy gathering
Lawrence will make big announcement at
clergy conference
MYRTLE BEACH - On Thursday the Chairman of the Diocese's Standing Committee continued to suggest that the Episcopal Church is planning a move against our bishop, clergy, and parishes even though there is no evidence supporting such a claim.
The Rev. Paul Fuener told clergy from the Myrtle Beach area that all vestries need to begin studying their options, while the Diocese arranges for clergy to meet with representatives of the Church Pension Fund to learn about the status of their retirement savings.
Fuener said he believes the Episcopal Church has no choice but to go after the Diocese if it fails to repudiate all anti-Church resolutions passed at recent Diocesan conventions, especially those denying "accession" to the Church's Constitution and Canons.
In fact, no one in any position of authority in the Episcopal Church has ever suggested that such a course of action is contemplated. A spokesman for the Church's Executive Council said in September that its Constitution automatically deems rebellious actions like those taken by these conventions to be "null and void" and require no response.
Bishop planning a big announcement Wednesday. During his remarks Fuener hinted that Bishop Lawrence would have an important announcement on Wednesday morning toward the end of a scheduled Diocesan clergy conference.
Speculation is that the Bishop will say that he does not plan to contest charges that may or may not be made against him by the Church Disciplinary Board of Bishops. The Board is investigating complaints by communicants in the Diocese that Lawrence's actions as a bishop appear to violate his commitment to uphold the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church."
Under this scenario, Bishop Lawrence would argue that the Episcopal Church's newly-modified disciplinary canon is "unconstitutional" and thus he will refuse to be judged by the procedures established under it.
According to our information, Thursday's meeting was respectful and somber, except for a couple of anti-Church tirades by young right-wing clergy from Myrtle Beach.
Fortunately, an increasing number of Diocesan clergy are resisting the hysteria being generated by the Diocese and right-wing bloggers, and realize that they are in no danger of being thrown out of the Episcopal Church, nor are their parishes in any jeopardy.
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 6
Myrtle Beach Rector Jumps Ship for ACNA (November 10, 2011)
MYRTLE BEACH - The Rector of Trinity Episcopal Church in Myrtle Beach announced this week that he will join the controversial "Anglican Church of North America" in January as a church planter and theologian under the direction of former Episcopal priest, Steve Wood.
On Friday Bishop Lawrence expressed his sadness at losing The Reverend Rob Sturdy but said his move was "an exciting opportunity". Sturdy is one of the youngest rectors in the Diocese, and among the more outspoken right-wing critics of traditional Episcopalians.
ACNA is neither part of the Episcopal Church nor the Anglican Communion. It is not clear by what authority Lawrence is allowing Sturdy to continue to serve as a rector in the Diocese since he has, in effect, renounced the ordination vows he took less than four years ago.
In 2008 Sturdy became rector of Trinity in his mid-twenties just after his ordination, only slightly more than a year earlier. His surprising promotion was encouraged by former Bishop Edward Salmon, and was controversial because he lacked experience and, in the view of some, the maturity to lead such a large congregation . He had served briefly as parish's Curate even though he was just a deacon right out of seminary.
A number of traditional Episcopalians left the parish shortly thereafter. According to Sturdy, they were not comfortable with his focus on the Gospel and the Bible.
Sturdy will work under the direction of Mr. Wood at St. Andrew's in Mount Pleasant. Bishop Lawrence allowed the parish to leave the Episcopal Church last year and join the ACNA operation. The full financial arrangement between the Diocese and the parish over property were never made public.
In 2008 Mr. Wood told his congregation that the Presiding Bishop is the Anti-Christ, and he considers the Episcopal Church to be a "whore." He holds the title of "Vicar General" in the ACNA organization and oversees its presence in the Carolinas. Read more of this story
+++++
Church Membership Report Inspires Cheers & Worries in the Diocese of SC
(November 3, 2011)
Growth from 2000 to 2007 led all dioceses
Decline after 2007 led all dioceses as Sunday attendance dropped as well
Important new statistics on Episcopal Church membership and attendance from 2000 to 2010 provide news for the Diocese of South Carolina that is both encouraging and worrisome.
The best news is that the number of our baptized members grew by 9.5% between 2000 and 2010, making us one of only three dioceses to experience positive growth during the past decade. North Carolina was second behind us at 4.6%.
That means that as of 2010, there were 29,196 baptized Episcopalians in the Diocese of South Carolina, compared to 26,661 in 2000.
During that same period, membership in the Episcopal Church declined by more than 16%. As of 2010, there were 2.1 million Episcopalians in the world, compared to 2.4 million in 2000, a troubling decline that is comparable to that experienced by other mainline denominations.
However, an ominous concern for the Diocese of South Carolina is that it has been losing members since a high point in 2007. In fact, from 2009 to 2010, the Diocese of South Carolina lost seven percent of its membership, making it the leader among dioceses in declining membership.
One more curious bit of information ... While there may be more of us in the Diocese since 2000, we are not going to church as often. Over the past ten years, our average Sunday attendance (ASA) dropped five percent in spite of our substantial growth in membership.
From 2009-10, ASA in the Diocese declined by nearly 14%. Read entire report
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 5
Bishop will not Confirm New Members of St. Mark's Chapel (November 4, 2011)
Bishop reportedly cites "canonical, pastoral, & political dimensions"
PORT ROYAL -- Bishop Lawrence abruptly canceled a scheduled Confirmation at St. Mark's Chapel near Beaufort this Sunday. SC Episcopalians has no idea why this has happened. Learn about St. Mark's
St. Mark's is a group of former parishioners from St. Helena’s Episcopal Church in Beaufort who have attempted to establish a traditional Episcopal Church congregation in Port Royal near Beaufort. Critics of Bishop Lawrence have complained that he will not recognize them because of their loyalty to the Episcopal Church.
The Bishop's surprising decision was relayed to members of St. Mark's by way of an electronic communication from their clergy Friday. This is the relevant text from their message.
"Dear members and friends of St. Mark's Chapel,
"For reasons that go beyond the capabilities of email and to make a long story short, Confirmation of St. Mark's' confirmands is being postponed.
The Bishop will be with us for the 4 pm service which will include an opportunity for us to 'reaffirm our baptismal vows,' but no confirmations will take place. He says that there are canonical, pastoral and political dimensions to his decision and that we need to respect his thoughts on the subject. We look forward to seeing you at St. Mark's on Sunday.
"Please keep our confirmands in your prayers... May God bless us all! Thanks be to God. -- Jack Nietert and Scott Shafferormer"
_________
Bishop Duncan, "Anglican Diocese" Lose in Court ... again (October 18, 2011)
Breakaway parishes must negotiate with continuing Diocese for use of parish property
Pittsburgh -- Deposed Bishop Robert Duncan admitted defeat today as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in essence refused to allow parishes in the Diocese of Pittsburgh seeking to join Duncan’s ad-hoc "Anglican Diocese" to walk off with parish properties.
Instead, they will have to negotiate with the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh, if they want to continue to use them. The decision today, which conforms to others in breakaway dioceses, effectively ends a struggle for the property. Duncan issued a statement accepting the ruling. Read Duncan's statement
________
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 4
Diocese's Tactics Backfiring? (October 15, 2011)
Most parishes still supporting Bishop Lawrence, but not planning on leaving the Church
This week's hyperbolic response by the Diocese of South Carolina to a request for Standing Committee minutes by a Church lawyer may be a sign of the jitters among Diocesan leaders about a pending review of Bishop Mark Lawrence’s leadership.
While most clergy and lay people in the Diocese appear to support Bishop Lawrence, many are cautioning that there are limits to their support for the Bishop's ongoing "war" with Episcopal Church leaders. Bishop Lawrence's decision to make his case in the news media rather than responding to the Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops does not appear to be winning him many converts either.
During the summer, several communicants of the Diocese submitted 63 pages of public records detailing Lawrence’s more controversial actions as Bishop to the Church’s Disciplinary Board and suggested they contain evidence of “abandonment of communion.”
Abandonment is a serious charge that could lead to a Bishop or priest being deposed.
Josephine Hicks, a Church attorney assisting the 18-member Board contacted the Diocese this week, requesting the minutes to assess the accuracy of the materials. In response, Diocesan leaders publicly challenged her authority, anti-Church bloggers attacked her character and motives, and others reportedly put pressure on her law firm. (Over the weekend Bishop Henderson announced that Ms. Hicks had withdrawn from matter because of conflicts in her law practice.)
Read Bishop Henderson's letter regarding Ms. Hicks
The commotion is similar to that created less than two years ago when the Diocese's former Chancellor was retained by the Episcopal Church and made a similar requests for documents. At that time, Lawrence famously described the request as an “incursion” by Church leaders into the “sovereign” Diocese of South Carolina and refused to hand over anything.
However, there may be a lot more than symbolic protest involved in the Diocese's refusal to allow the Disciplinary Board to see the minutes.
SC Episcopalians believes they will portray a Standing Committee acting largely as a rubber stamp for Lawrence and his advisers by approving schemes to provoke Church leaders and further alienate the Diocese from the Episcopal Church. They are also likely to give insight into the peculiar ease with which St. Andrew’s in Mount Pleasant was allowed leave the Episcopal Church last year with most of its property.
The minutes would also answer questions about Lawrence loyalists on the Standing Committee who reportedly served nearly nine months beyond the expiration of their terms in 2010. They also would contain recorded votes of clergy members on key actions that could be considered violations of their ordination oaths of loyalty to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship" of the Episcopal Church.
Meanwhile, over the past two days, SC Episcopalians has heard randomly from parishes around the Diocese, suggesting that they will continue to support the Bishop at this point, but that support does not necessarily include leaving the Episcopal Church.
Courts throughout the country are continuing to side with the Episcopal Church in cases where parishioners have tried to the leave the Church with their property. Clergy as well have their own issues to address, should they leave the Episcopal Church for one that may not have the same employment opportunities or benefits.
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 3
Bishop Henderson Cools Diocese's Frenzied
Blitz of the News Media (October 13, 2011)
The former Bishop of Upper South Carolina and current chairman of the Disciplinary Board reviewing complaints against Bishop Mark Lawrence sounded a calming tone Tuesday after spokesmen for the Diocese launched a frenzied blitz of the news media.
In brief written statement, retired Bishop Dorsey Henderson outlined his Board's review process as prescribed by the Church's Constitution, and stressed that none of its members had formed any opinions about the complaints against Bishop Lawrence. He also said that Lawrence was welcome to respond to the complaints as extensively as he would like.
Henderson's statement read:
"The Disciplinary Board is only in the earliest stages of its work and has not reached any decision regarding the credibility of the information received or whether the actions and conduct reported actually constitute abandonment. It has made no 'charges' of any kind; neither has any other part or structure of The Episcopal Church.
"The Disciplinary Board will, by the grace of God and with diligence, proceed methodically, carefully, prayerfully—and confidentially—to meet its canonical responsibility, including a request for, and consideration of, any and all input that Bishop Lawrence wishes to be considered.
"The President of the Disciplinary Board has provided Bishop Lawrence with all of the information it has received and is under consideration, and will continue to do so."
Henderson issued his statement after the Diocese's spin machine went into overdrive accusing the Church of plotting to depose Lawrence and "attack" the diocese and its parishes. Click here for Bishop Henderson's comments.
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 2
Bishop Lawrence's Defense Does Little to Inspire Worried Clergy
(October 12, 2011)
Diocesan Leadership seemed "detached and delusional" at closed-door meeting of clergy
Diocese uses meeting to launch frenzied
media blitz
JAMES ISLAND -- Mark Lawrence headed to the site of his election as Bishop of South Carolina more than four years ago to defend himself against complaints that he has failed to adhere to his consecration oath to conform to the “doctrine, discipline, and, worship of the Episcopal Church.”
In a three-hour, private meeting with Diocesan clergy on Tuesday, Bishop Lawrence sometimes angrily responded to each of twelve complaints about his leadership currently under review by a disciplinary board of fellow bishops, clergy, and lay people from throughout the Church.
The Bishop told the gathering that he was staying with the Episcopal Church “for now,” but could not “tell what the future would bring,” according to a participant in the audience. The gathering was held at St. James' Episcopal Church on James Island.
Most of the meeting was reportedly a rambling monologue by the Bishop, followed by a carefully-orchestrated series of speakers determined to put an hysterical spin on the inquiry.
Beaufort Lawyer Alan Runyan followed Lawrence, suggesting, without any evidence, that the Church was proceeding on a "fast track" to depose Lawrence as a prelude to "attacks" on the diocese and its parishes. According to the Diocese's news release, the "picture painted was an ugly one of expensive litigation, confrontation and acrimony in which all involved significantly lost."
The Reverend Jeffrey Miller, past president of the Standing Committee stated during the gathering, “The question is not whether we can stay; it is whether they will let us stay and follow what we believe.”
In fact, there is nothing to suggest that the Episcopal Church will not allow churchmen like Bishop Lawrence and Mr. Miller to remain Episcopalians and follow what they believe. None of the complaints being considered by the disciplinary board have anything to do with Lawrence's beliefs or those of Mr. Miller.
Some who were present described at Tuesday's meeting described the overall content of the presentations Tuesday as "paranoid" and "delusional".
They also observed that the Bishop's comments "were not remotely pastoral", and seemed devoid of concern for the impact of his actions on younger clergy or the parishes. Bishop Lawrence is fully vested in the Church's retirement fund, and likely would have little trouble finding employment, if he wanted to continue working.
Former SC Bishop Fitz Allison spoke toward the end of the meeting to rally the spirits of group. According to one clergyman who had sat through the session, "It was definitely needed."
Since Lawrence's consecration, the Presiding Bishop and other bishops have tried to reach out to Lawrence and the Diocese repeatedly, even as their rhetoric and hostility toward the Church became more pronounced.
In 2008, former SC Bishop Ed Salmon told the House of Bishops that Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori "bent over backwards" to help Lawrence when his election as Bishop of South Carolina was in trouble.
However, the Diocese took little note of her support.
Shortly after her installation, the Presiding Bishop made a three-day trip to the Diocese expressly to listen to the concerns of Lawrence and the clergy.
On that visit, she was famously treated with disrespect, including being publicly labeled "The Anti-Christ" by the rector of one of her host parishes. The same rector later referred to the Episcopal Church as a "whore".
Not only did the Bishop make no apparent effort to discipline the rector in question, but he later provided what he calls "a generous pastoral response" in facilitating the departure of the rector, his parish, and most of its property from the Episcopal Church.
Since that visit, the rantings of the Diocese have largely been ignored over the years, even though Diocesan leaders claimed the Church leaders were at "war" with them.
However, over the past two years, the Bishop and Standing Committee continued to bait Church leaders in ways that can not be ignored.
Over the past year, they urged successive Diocesan conventions to rewrite the Diocese's governing documents in ways that would place conditions on the Diocese's "accession" to the Episcopal Church's Constitution and Canons. A diocese can not place "qualifications" on accession and remain a member of the Episcopal Church.
The Diocesan Constitution was successfully amended in February by the 2011 Diocesan Convention and that was significant enough to trigger complaints from within the Diocese that include eleven other instances where the Bishop's conduct may have violated his oath of loyalty to the Church.
Read the Diocese's version of this story by clicking here.
_____________
Diocesan Meltdown: Part I
The Episcopal Church Reviewing Complaints about SC Bishop's Leadership
(October 5, 2011)
Do Bishop Lawrence's acts of rebellion constitute "abandonment of Communion"?
Inquiry generated by complaints from within the Diocese, Bishop Lawrence calls for a closed-door meeting to rally the clergy
A disciplinary committee of bishops has begun a formal inquiry into the rocky leadership of SC Bishop Mark Lawrence, including his engineering a revision of that part of the Diocese's Constitution essential for membership in the Episcopal Church.
The review could lead to formal charges against the Bishop, if there is sufficient evidence to show that his actions are a violation his consecration oath and authority as a bishop in the Church.
Bishop Lawrence and the Diocese's Standing Committee have repeatedly challenged the authority of the Episcopal Church over the past four years, but have largely been ignored in that their actions were meaningless.
However, over the past year, the Bishop has encouraged the Standing Committee and delegates to successive Diocesan conventions to rewrite the Diocese's governing documents in ways that would place conditions on the Diocese's "accession" to the Episcopal Church's Constitution and Canons.
That was achieved in February at the 2011 Diocesan Convention and was significant enough to trigger complaints from within the Diocese that include eleven other instances where the Bishop's conduct may have violated his oath of loyalty to the Church.
Bishop Lawrence was informed of the inquiry first in a phone call and then in a letter from The Rt. Rev. Dorsey Henderson, former Bishop of the Diocese of Upper South Carolina and current President of the Episcopal Church’s 19-member Disciplinary Committee.
According to Henderson, communicants in the Diocese have complained about Lawrence's actions, and asked that they be reviewed to determine if they constituted “abandonment of communion." He stressed that his Committee's inquiry was not initiated by Church leaders or the Presiding Bishop.
Every bishop and priest in the Episcopal Church takes an oath to “uphold the doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.” Abandonment occurs when a bishop or priest violates that oath.
Accession means that a Diocese agrees that the authority of its Constitution is superseded by that of the Episcopal Church when the two are in conflict. Last February's Diocesan convention reversed that relationship, claiming that the Diocese has the final word.
"Unqualified accession" is essential for a Diocese to belong to the Episcopal Church, in much the same way as states belong to the United States. Lawrence claims that the "accession" requirement only applies to dioceses created after the Church was founded. As a founding member of the Episcopal Church, he says that the Diocese of South Carolina is exempt.
Other issues related to abandonment include the Bishop’s ordination of his son as an Episcopal priest even though he had been ordained as a deacon in another denomination, his insistence that the Diocese is “sovereign”, and his insistence that the Episcopal Church has no legal claim to Episcopal Church property in the Diocese.
Click here to read the 63-page complaint.
Bishop Lawrence also received a separate letter from Church Attorney Josephine Hicks from Charlotte requesting copies of minutes from Standing Committee meetings and records of the ordination of the Bishop’s son.
Click here to read Ms. Hicks' letter
Instead of simply providing the documents that might disprove the "abandonment" charge, the Bishop has called for a closed-door meeting of Diocesan clergy to rally them to his cause.
Click here to learn more about the specific complaints against Bishop Lawrence from Episcopal News Service
_________
SC Diocese Rejects Church's View that its Actions are "Null and Void" (September 28, 2011)
Diocese sticks to dubious claim that its rejection
of "accession" to the National Church's Constitution is legal
The Diocese of South Carolina reasserted today that its Constitution is not subject to that of the Episcopal Church because of its status as a founding diocese of the Church.
In a letter to the Secretary of the Church's Executive Council, Bishop Lawrence and Standing Committee Chairman Paul Fuener disputed a determination this summer by the Council's Joint Standing Committee on Governance and Administration that the Diocese's recent actions, removing accession to the Church's Constitution, are "null and void." (See article below).
The back-and-forth between the Diocese and Church officials was generated by an inquiry last spring from Charleston Attorney Melinda Lucka and other SC Episcopalians, questioning the legitimacy of the Diocese's actions.
Click here to see the Diocese's entire response.
_______________
Episcopal Church tells Diocese that Recent Changes to its Constitution are Meaningless (September 21, 2011)
Removal of Access Clause is "null and void"
An official of the Episcopal Church informed Bishop Mark Lawrence this month that recent changes made to the Constitution of the Diocese of South Carolina are “null and void” in the eyes of the Episcopal Church.
Last February delegates to the 2011 Diocesan Convention gave final approval to amendments to the Diocese’s governing document eliminating “accession” to the Episcopal Church's Constitution.
Accession means that a Diocese agrees that the national Church’s Constitution supersedes that of the Diocese when they are in conflict. The actions of the Convention, approved and supported by the Bishop and Standing Committee, would have reversed that relationship.
According to the Secretary of the Church’s Executive Council, members of its Joint Standing Committee on Governance and Administration determined over the summer that the actions of the Diocesan Convention are sufficiently similar to those taken by rebellious Dioceses of Quincy, San Joaquin, Pittsburgh, and Fort Worth in previous years as to be covered by the same 2007 Executive Council Resolution (NAC023) that declared them meaningless.
The Resolution specifically states that “any diocesan amendment that purports in any way to limit or lessen an unqualified accession to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church are null and void, as if such amendments had not been passed.”
It goes further to say that this determination is applicable, not just to those four dioceses, but any other dioceses that take “steps or have adopted amendments that purport in any way to limit or lessen unqualified accession to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church”.
In short, once a diocese commits to join the Episcopal Church, it has no authority to leave. Individual clergy and lay people can leave, but a diocese as a corporate entity can’t.
Bishop Lawrence, who claims the Diocese of South Carolina is “sovereign”, has argued that the Diocese wasn’t “intending” to leave the Church, even though he and the Standing Committee were fully aware that accession to the Church’s Constitution is essential to membership.
The underlying issue here is the ownership of Episcopal Church property in the Diocese, specifically the property of parishes that might want to leave the Episcopal Church. The Bishop and the Standing Committee of the Diocese argue that they alone have the authority to decide what happens to it.
(These controversial amendments are probably also meaningless since the Diocese appears to have violated its own Constitution and Canons to re-convene the 2010 Diocesan Convention to adopt them. Read more)
__________
ABC likely to Announce Early Retirement Next Year (September 19, 2011)
Right-wing Anglicans want new ABC to replace the Episcopal Church in the Anglican Communion
Early money is on the Archbishop of York and maybe the Bishop of London
Numerous news sources in London confirm that Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams is ready to call it quits next year. Williams is widely considered scholarly, brilliant, and hugely inept in the face of right-wing attempts to split the worldwide Anglican Communion apart.
The Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, is considered the likely choice to succeed Williams, who is reported to be considering a teaching position at Cambridge.
Sentamu is a native of Uganda, considered slightly more conservative than Williams, and proven particularly adept at navigating the tricky politics of the Anglican Communion. The drawback to Sentamu is that he is older than Rowan Williams.
Click here to learn more about Archbishop Sentamu.
However, Sentamu is not universally popular, leading some to speculate that a dark horse candidate, like Richard Chartes, Bishop of London since 1995, might get the nod. Chartes is a close friend of Prince Charles. (He also has white hair and a beard, so he may already looks the part.)
Right-wing Primates and their American allies are hoping that the appointment of a new, more conservative ABC would result in the expulsion of the Episcopal Church from the Anglican Communion.
When Williams retires, the Prime Minister will propose two names to the Queen, and she will select one. The British Monarch is actually the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
In selecting ABCs in the past Queen Elizabeth generally has veered more toward the choice favored by the Prime Minister.
___________
NEW! Former SC Bishop to Lead Nashotah House Seminary
(June 29, 2011) click here
____________
House of Bishops Still Trying to Get Answers from Lawrence, SC Diocese
(March 23, 2011)
FLAT ROCK, NC -- This month the Episcopal Church’s House of Bishops is scheduled to meet at Kanuga, where SC Bishop Mark Lawrence will most likely be asked again by his colleagues to explain what the heck the Diocese of South Carolina is doing. SC Episcopalians has learned that many, if not most, bishops are exasperated with Lawrence, who they say has been evasive and vague about what the Diocese wants.
Last month the Diocesan Convention, at Lawrence’s instigation, voted to abolish its legal ties to the Episcopal Church. Last fall Lawrence and another convention proclaimed themselves to be “sovereign,” whatever that means.
Lawrence has burned bridges with a number of the most senior bishops who voted to consent to his election in 2007, after he promised them he would not try to lead the Diocese out of the Episcopal Church. Several of them even pressured their Standing Committees to consent when some of their members doubted Lawrence's sincerity.
______________
Texas Secessionists Out of Options
as Another Court backs the Episcopal Church
(March 17, 2011)
Legal victories for the Episcopal Church add up, as the position of Diocese of SC becomes increasingly untenable
The Texas Court of Appeals in Austin has sustained a lower court order awarding the property belonging to an Episcopal Church in San Angelo to the Diocese and the continuing vestry and parishioners. The Court rejected the claims of secessionist members of the congregation.
Although there may yet be an appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, this is a big win for the Diocese of NW Texas. It bolsters the legal theory that Episcopal Church property belongs to the Episcopal Church and those duly constituted dioceses governed by its Constitution and Canons.
The opinion also approves the trial court's application of "Neutral Principals of Law" by including the canons of the Episcopal Church and the Diocese among the governing documents applicable to property ownership.
Read the opinion
____________
"Enthusiastic" Episcopalians Celebrate Traditions and the Future of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina (March 12, 2011)
NORTH CHARLESTON --Traditional Episcopalians rallied Saturday in North Charleston at an all-day conference that had the upbeat look and feel of Diocesan conventions of years ago. Nearly 300 people attended the event that included an illustrious panel of speakers including Bonnie Anderson, the President of the Episcopal Church’s House of Deputies.
The Episcopal Forum of SC, organizer of the “Enthusiastically Episcopalian” conference, intentionally structured the event such that it did not appear to be a reaction to the recent annual convention of the Diocese at which delegates voted to sever legal ties with the Episcopal Church.
The Forum sees its role as promoting the doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina. Barbara Mann, president of the Forum said that Saturday's event was an opportunity for SC Episcopalians to remain connected to the mainstream of life in the Church.
Indeed, participants on Saturday seemed to represent all parts of the Diocese. Many said that the trip to North Charleston was worth it if only to experience the traditional worship of the Episcopal Church, and hear encouraging news of the work of the Church around the world.
The Rev. Canon Michael Wright, rector of Grace Episcopal Church in Charleston, led the morning Eucharist that included a full choir and a congregation filled with more bishops, clergy, and lay leaders than have ever participated in such an event.
Click here to visit Forum website
________________
Diocesan Convention Finalizes Attempt to Secede from National Church,
as Enthusiasm for Bishop's Agenda Cools (February 19, 2011, rev. March 4)
Lawrence says we're not leaving, but urges actions that dissolve our legal ties anyway
Deepening financial crisis shows support for the Diocese has eroded; Revenues from parishes declines 21% over two years
Legal Case for Secessionists in Fort Worth Implodes (January 24, 2011)
A Texas Judge has ruled that would-be secessionists in the Diocese of Fort Worth, who say they have realigned themselves with another Anglican province, have no claim to Episcopal Church property. The ruling against former Bishop Jack Iker and his anti-Episcopal Church supporters is in line with decisions being reached in almost every similar case in the country.
The ruling against Iker, an ally of former SC Bishop Edward Salmon and Bishop Lawrence, does not directly affect the current peculiar efforts of the Diocese of South Carolina to distance itself from the National Church.
However, it is a further reminder that judges around the country are not buying the argument that there is a legal justification for a diocese to consider itself "sovereign." Such a claim effectively denies that the Episcopal Church has any legal interest in Church property within the borders of the Diocese.
Lawrence and his Standing Committee convinced delegates to a gathering of parish leaders last fall to approve a resolution making such a claim.
SC Episcopalians continues to believe that the gathering, which the Diocese claims was a legitimate extension of its 2010 Diocesan Convention last April, was not authorized by its Constitution and Canons. We further maintain that as many as one-third of the members of the Standing Committee at the time were serving illegally.
Read full story
__________
Reconvened Convention Approves Changes Allowing Possible Secession from the National Church
(October 15, 2010, revised October 19, 2010)
Presiding Bishop "grieves" that Lawrence and his supporters misinterpreted her "concern... as aggression"
When she was informed of the convention's actions, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said "I grieve these actions, but I especially grieve Bishop Lawrence's perception of my heartfelt concern for him and for the people of South Carolina as aggression. I don't seek to change his faithfully held positions on human sexuality, nor do I seek to control the inner workings of the diocese."
The most troubling part of the convention to observers was the apparent lack of understandable legal guidance for the delegates.
The Bishop has recently relied on Alan Runyon, a lawyer from Beaufort to articulate the Diocese's position on key issues, including revisions to the Church's disciplinary procedures. Mr. Runyon is the legal counsel to the Standing Committee, and frequently spoke to the delegates with some authority about his interpretation of the resolutions.
The Diocesan Chancellor Wade Logan was not in attendance, but in comments to SC Episcopalians after the convention Bishop Lawrence emphatically rejected rumors that he had lost confidence in him in favor of Mr. Runyon.
The Bishop dismissed such speculation as "sheer nonsense," professing full confidence in Mr. Logan, a well-respected attorney from Charleston.
Traditional Episcopalians watching the convention felt Lawrence and other diocesan officials appeared to have been carefully prepped on what to say and not say about leaving the Episcopal Church.
Click here to read the rest of this SC Episcopalians' story
Read Episcopal Cafe's full story
_______________
NEW! SC Episcopalians Questions Legality
of October 15th Re-Convention (October 8, 2010)
In a letter to Bishop Lawrence, we asked him by what authority he and the Standing Committee are trying to re-convene delegates to a convention that was over seven months ago. We also don't get how several members of the Standing Committee are still serving nine months after their terms expired.
Read the entire letter
_________
Loyal S.C. Episcopalians Urge National Church to Investigate the Diocese of South Carolina; Lawrence Responds
(September 25, 2010)
Episcopal Forum claims Lawrence has violated his vows and failed to protect Church property
Diocese mushes forward toward illegal Oct. 15th
Re-convention
Loyal Episcopalians in the Diocese of South Carolina this week pleaded with national Church leaders to formally investigate the current efforts of Bishop Mark Lawrence and his Standing Committee to effectively sever ties between the Diocese and the Episcopal Church.
In a dramatic letter to the Church's Executive Council and House of Bishops, the Episcopal Forum of South Carolina claims that Lawrence has abdicated his obligations as bishop in the Church by failing to act against parishes in rebellion, particularly in the case of St. Andrew's. Mt. Pleasant.
The organization claims that Lawrence's goal is the “alienation and disassociation of the Diocese of South Carolina from the Episcopal Church."
Earlier this month Lawrence, who maintains the Diocese is “sovereign," asked delegates to last spring's Annual Convention to reconvene on October 15th and ratify six resolutions that effectively repeal the critical “accession” clause in the Diocesan Constitution, a requirement for membership in the Episcopal Church.
Without such a clause, a diocese forfeits it right to own Episcopal Church property and leaves the status of its clergy as Episcopal priests in limbo.
On Friday, Lawrence issued a response to the Forum’s accusations. His comments were more evasive than specific, except that he made clear that he is putting all his marbles on a recent oddball ruling by the S.C. Supreme Court that seemed to deny the legal status of the Episcopal Church as “hierarchical.”
Without such status, it is arguable that the national Church can not lay claim to the assets of a diocese of parishes that choose to leave the Church.
Read the full story by clicking here
_________________
Commentary: Anglican Smack-Down
by Diana Butler Bass
(June 9, 2010)
What does the latest missive from the Archbishop of Canterbury mean to us, if anything? Celebrated church historian and commentator breaks it down for the rest of us. full story
__________________
Convention Rallies to Bishop's Shadowbox "War"; Financial and Constitutional Challenges Loom (March 25, 2010)
St. Andrew's, Mt. Pleasant Votes to Sever Ties (March 26, 2010)
________________
The shadowbox “war” by the Diocese of
South Carolina
against the Episcopal Church entered a new phase of absurdity this month
as Bishop Lawrence and the Standing Committee essentially
refused to tell Church leaders what the Diocese is doing in response to
maneuvers
by four parishes to distance themselves from the Church.
full story
_____________
OPINION: Why AMiA Dissidents & Rwanda's Anglicans Really Split Up
(January 12, 2012) Full story
NEW! Va. Court says the Episcopal Church has a Legal Interest in all Parish Properties (January 11, 2012)
Diocese of Virginia: “Our goal [is] to return faithful Episcopalians to their church homes and Episcopal properties to the mission of the Church"
In another warning to rebellious parishes in South Carolina, CANA must turn over disputed parish property to The Episcopal Church
Click here to read full story and the Court's opinion
Diocesan Meltdown Part 19:
NEW! Rebellious Parishes Needlessly Inviting Lawsuits over Church Property (January 9, 2012)
New legal opinion suggests reliance on All Saints' case to hold on to Church property will lead to complicated legal entanglements
Our Diocese changed its name in October 2010, signaling that it is something separate from the Episcopal Church
A number of parishes in the Diocese of South Carolina are taking steps to change their corporate documents in ways they think will allow them to walk away from the Episcopal Church with property that, in some cases, has belonged to the Church since colonial times.
According to an opinion by Charleston attorney Melinda Lucka, these parishes would be acting on a misinterpretation of a 2009 state Supreme Court ruling in the case of All Saints' on Pawley's Island.
Reliance on this ruling could very lead to expensive legal entanglements, if recent history in other dioceses is an indicator.
In that case, All Saints' congregation voted to leave the Episcopal Church and join a missionary effort affiliated with the ultra-conservative Anglican Province of Rwanda. The Court allowed the breakaway group to retain the parish property, based largely on a 1902 rechartering and a 1903 quit-claim deed granted to the parish by the Diocese. Through the deed, the Diocese relinquished any legal claim it might have had in the parish's property.
The Episcopal Church is considered by courts to be "hierarchical", meaning that parish properties are held "in trust" for congregations by their dioceses, which are constituted by their national Church. The Court held that the trust relationship was invalidated in All Saints' case by the Diocese's recording of the quit-claim deed.
Read the full opinion here
Congregations acting without understanding the implications. Beginning this month, a several congregations will be convening parish meetings to consider their future in response to urgings from the leadership of the Diocese.
The Diocese maintains that, thanks to the Court ruling in the All Saints' case and the recording of quitclaim deeds recently issued by the Diocese, they are free to choose a new path forward, independent from the Episcopal Church.
For example, parishes like St. Paul's, Summerville are asking parishioners if they want their vestries to delete all references to accession to the Constitution and Canons of the Episcopal Church. St. Paul's, Conway asked its congregants if they wanted their vestry to delete references to the Constitution and Canons of both the Episcopal Church and the Diocese (they did). Trinity on Edisto Island simply announced to its members that they will be amending its corporate documents in ways that were not specified at an upcoming parish meeting.
All of this activity has credibility because it is being encouraged by the leadership of the Diocese, which formally amended its corporate documents in October 2010, renaming itself an "Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina" as opposed to "a Diocese in the Episcopal Church."
SC Episcopalians has discovered that many lay people are being told they must choose to affiliate with either the Diocese of South Carolina or the Episcopal Church, but not both. In fact, there is no reason for any parish to take any action --- an option that doesn't seem to be getting communicated to the laity.
In her opinion, Ms. Lucka argues that the Diocese is wrongfully assuming that the Supreme Court invalidated the property interests of the Episcopal Church in all of its parishes in South Carolina. In the case of All Saints', she argues, the Court did invalidate those interests, but only in the unique circumstances of that parish.
The Diocese's contention that the ruling applies to every Episcopal Church parish in South Carolina is, in the opinion of SC Episcopalians, a leap that would be daunting even to the Flying Walendas.
Diocese's interpretation of All Saints' ruling highly questionable. The Diocese's expansive view of the All Saints' case has been rejected repeatedly by Federal and state courts throughout the country. Courts in Georgia and Virginia are the most recent to reject it.
Lawsuits against parishes in this diocese eventually would be appealed to higher courts, where validation of this hijacking of Church assets has little chance of succeeding.
If the Diocese's view is valid, it would apply to every parish in the Upper Diocese as well as to the Methodists, Presbyterians, and every other "hierarchical church" in the state. So far, none of them have taken any actions similar to those being encouraged by our Diocese, nor do they have any plans to do so.
++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 18:
"Clarifying Conversation" between Southern Bishops and Lawrence Yields Nothing (December 15, 2011)
Bishops from North Carolina, Georgia, and Upper SC getting it that Bishop Lawrence is not trying to stay in the Episcopal Church
CHARLESTON -- No one really expected anything to come from Wednesday’s meeting between South Carolina Bishop Mark Lawrence and six of his colleagues from neighboring dioceses ... and the meeting lived up to expectations.
However, if there was any lingering confidence among his colleagues that Lawrence was “keeping his word” about staying in the Episcopal Church, it evaporated. At least two of the bishops at the meeting had publicly expressed sympathy for Lawrence prior to the meeting, but as nearly as SC Episcopalians can surmise from their reported reactions to the meeting, they got a wake-up call.
SC Parishes move forward with plans to leave the Church. Even as the bishops’ meeting was going on, a number of parishes, with the encouragement of the Diocese, were moving on with plans to amend their corporate charters in ways that would take them out of the Episcopal Church and likely plunge them into costly and prolonged litigation.
One such parish went forward with a planned parish meeting in Summerville only hours after the bishops’ conference. The featured speaker was Jim Lewis, Lawrence’s Canon to the Ordinary, who continued to beat a very one-sided drum, while rector Mike Lumpkin told the parish that it was going to have to choose between the Episcopal Church and the Diocese.
Lewis' us-versus-them message was exactly the same as the one Diocesan spokesmen had been giving before the bishops met.
Did Lawrence ever in tend to keep his promise to stay in the Church? Within the House of Bishops, Lawrence’s colleagues have been slow to accept that he would so openly betray those who, only four years ago, believed his assurances that he would not try to lead the Diocese of South Carolina out of the Episcopal Church.
At that time, his election was lacking consents from a majority of the Church’s 110 dioceses to be consecrated.
However, a number of both liberal and conservative bishops intervened on then-Father Lawrence's behalf with their standing committees, based on public and private commitments they felt he'd given them.
According to former SC Bishop Edward Salmon, even the Presiding Bishop “bent over backwards” to help salvage his election.
Diocese responds with its familiar Good-Cop Bad-Cop routine. Wednesday’s meeting came about after the Bishop of East Carolina asked Lawrence last week to meet with him and other bishops in neighboring dioceses. That request grew out of a conference of southern bishops last month, where a number of Lawrence’s colleagues said they wanted to have a face-to-face meeting with Lawrence before discussing what to do about his behavior.
The meeting never had a chance of producing anything positive. The day the Province IV bishops asked for a meeting with Lawrence, the Diocese spokesman and Anglican Communion Development Coordinator, the Rev. Canon Dr. Kendall Harmon, dismissed the bishops' request for a meeting as "pastorally destructive" and "dripping with hypocrisy."
The Standing Committee couldn't resist the opportunity to insert itself either, and issued a sarcastic letter, demanding that the visiting bishops abide by the Constitution & Canons of the Episcopal Church while they were in the Diocese (even though the Diocese refuses to do so itself).The following statement was issued by the participants in Wednesday's meeting and was posted on the Diocesan website:
"On Wednesday, December 14, Province IV
bishops diocesan were invited to attend a meeting in Charleston, South
Carolina with Bishop Mark Lawrence to discuss the recent issuing of
quitclaim deeds by Bishop Lawrence and the Standing Committee of the
Diocese of South Carolina to parishes of the diocese. A representative
group who were available at the appointed time and date attended the
meeting.
"Gracious hospitality and collegiality characterized the gathering during which we prayed and participated in open, honest, and forthright conversation. Probing questions were asked by all, and it is fair to say that we did not agree on all matters discussed. For the visiting bishops, the gathering particularly helped to clarify the context of the Diocese of South Carolina’s quitclaims decision. Where we go in the future is a matter of prayer and ongoing engagement of concerns before us, an engagement we embrace out of our love for Christ and his Church.
The Right Reverend Scott Anson Benhase
The Episcopal Diocese of Georgia
The Right Reverend Michael B. Curry
The Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina
The Rt. Rev. Clifton Daniel III
The Episcopal Diocese of East Carolina
The Rt. Rev. Don E. Johnson
The Episcopal Diocese of West Tennessee
The Rt. Rev. Mark J. Lawrence
The Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina
The Rt. Rev. G. Porter Taylor
The Episcopal Diocese of Western North Carolina
The Rt. Rev. W. Andrew Waldo
The Episcopal Diocese of Upper South Carolina"
Diocesan Meltdown Part 17:
NEW! Standing Committee, Canon Harmon Inject Themselves into Bishops' Meeting (December 9, 2011)
Hostile tone in letter to Bishop Daniel reflects delusional nature of Diocesan leadership
Canon Harmon claims Bishops' meeting request was "pastorally destructive" and "dripping with hypocrisy"
The Diocese of South Carolina continued its sputtering defense of itself from imagined attacks by the Episcopal Church over the weekend. This time it's the Standing Committee attempting to disrupt yet another sane and responsible attempt by the Episcopal Church to figure out what the Diocese wants.
Read this letter for yourself
++++
AMiA Bishops, Anglican Province of Rwanda Split (December 6, 2011)
The Anglican Mission in America, one of the original dissident groups to separate from the Episcopal Church over a decade ago, has in effect severed its ties to the Anglican Province of Rwanda following the resignations of most of its American bishops.
Last week Rwandan Primate Archbishop Onesphore Rwaj gave an ultimatum to AMiA leader, Bishop Chuck Murphy, to either resign or recant for statements and actions the Province's House of Bishops perceived to be offensive.
Murphy and almost all of the other American missionary bishops consecrated by the Rwandans effectively resigned their positions today by failing to renew their commitment to the Province.
Murphy was the rector of All Saints', Pawleys Island when the parish initially attempted to leave the Episcopal Church with its property. AMiA is still headquartered in Pawleys Island. read more
++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 16:
NEW! Lawrence will meet with Fellow Bishops for "Clarifying Conversation" on Property Issues (December 6, 2012)
"We have had no direct communication with you," East Carolina Bishop complains;
Previous attempts to engage Lawrence have largely been met with frustration
SC Bishop Mark Lawrence has agreed to meet with a representation of his fellow bishops from Province IV who requested a "clarifying conversation" about his recent execution of legal documents relinquishing the Diocese's interest in millions of dollars in Episcopal Church property.
Lawrence will meet with as yet unnamed bishops on December 14th as part of a visit that apparently will include a presentation prepared by the Standing Committee.
The Rt. Rev. Clifton Daniel of the Diocese of East Carolina made the request to Bishop Lawrence Monday on behalf of their colleagues in dioceses as far west as Louisiana, as far north as Kentucky and as far south as Florida.
Read the letter from Bishop Daniel
Bishop Daniel's request grew our of a meeting of the Province's bishops last week, which Lawrence had apparently skipped out on.
Daniel's letter said that the Province's bishops had “determined that it is our duty as bishops of this province to address these concerns in direct communication with you, as Jesus exhorts his followers in Matthew’s Gospel (18:15-20), and in accord with our ordination vows regarding the unity and governance of the church.”
He noted that “we have had no direct communication from you regarding these reported actions."
Daniel and his colleagues will hardly be the first group to try to get Lawrence to explain his views. Bishop Lawrence has never had a particularly warm relationship with his fellow bishops.Since 2008 when he first became bishop, members of the House of Bishops have made numerous attempts engage him in meaningful dialogue about his self-described "war" with the Episcopal Church, but little came from those opportunities.
Shortly after her election, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori made a personal visit to South Carolina to "listen" to the concerns of the Bishop and Diocesan clergy, but was famously treated with public rudeness and disrespect, all apparently with Lawrence's assent.
Read the Episcopal News Service story on this
++++Diocesan Meltdown Part 15:
NEW! Lawrence Matter Far from Settled
(December 1, 2011)
Disciplinary Board needed documents the
Diocese wouldn't provide
Critics say disciplinary process needs to be strengthened to rein in rebellious bishops
The failure of the Episcopal Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops to certify that SC Bishop Mark Lawrence has not "abandoned communion" was not exactly a ringing endorsement of his leadership, SC Episcopalians has determined.
In his statement announcing the Board's decision last week, retired Bishop Dorsey Henderson stressed that the decision was made solely based on 63-pages of documents provided by communicants of the Diocese. Without the benefit of further investigation and documents withheld by the Diocese, a majority of the Board members felt they did not have enough to go on to certify "abandonment".
"Based on the information before it, the Board was unable to make the conclusions essential to a certification that Bishop Lawrence had abandoned the communion of the Church," Henderson said.
Two years ago, the Diocese reacted vociferously when a lawyer for the Episcopal Church's asked for Standing Committee minutes and other documents related the status of properties owned by certain parishes. A few months ago, an attorney for the Board similarly requested standing committee minutes, and was attacked by right-bloggers and others supportive of Bishop Lawrence. She eventually was forced to resign her position.
The Church's Disciplinary canon does not prohibit the DBB from revisiting any of the original complaints should additional material surface in the future. However, the Board does not have investigatory authority and it can not force the Diocese to cooperate.
The Church's disciplinary process also doesn't prohibit the consideration of new allegations, particularly those that might be associated with Lawrence's recent showering of parishes with legal documents relinquishing the Diocese's trust interest in their property. The DBB's recently concluded review did not include that issue.
Read reaction to the DBB decision in other dioceses
++++++
Diocesan Meltdown Part 14:
NEW! Disciplinary Board says Evidence is Insufficient to Certify "Abandonment"
(November 28, 2011, revised 11/29/11)
Members wanted more documentation of Bishop Lawrence's support of rebellious actions
Recent action relinquishing Diocese's interests in parish property was not included in complaints reviewed
Recent complaints against SC Bishop Mark Lawrence do not rise to the level of "abandonment of communion" with the Episcopal Church, according to its Disciplinary Board for Bishops (DBB).
The astonishing finding, announced today by the Board's President Bishop Dorsey Henderson, left many in and out of the Diocese scratching their heads, as to its implications.
Among the complaints against Bishop Lawrence was his refusal to acknowledge the authority of the Episcopal Church, including its Constitution and Canons, and his open support for rebellious parishes leaving the Church with their properties.
According to a statement issued by Henderson, none of these actions rises to the level of "abandonment" nor apparently is a barrier to Lawrence's serving as a bishop in good standing in the Church. After Henderson's announcement, Bishop Lawrence took the occasion to remind the Diocese that he considered the Board to be illegally constituted and therefore had no real interest in whether it found his actions to be abandonment or not.
According to the Church’s newly revised disciplinary canon, “abandonment” means that a bishop has renounced its "doctrine, discipline, and worship” either by open expression, or by the performance of episcopal acts and/or unauthorized participation in religious entities not in communion with the Episcopal Church.
Unnamed communicants in the Diocese complained to the Board last summer that Lawrence’s actions over the past four years are tantamount to “abandonment”.
However, a majority of those on the Disciplinary Board apparently were not willing to go that far.
The case against Lawrence is the first time the newly revised canon has been tested.
Unfortunately, the Board failed to provide any insight as to its reasons for rejecting any of the twelve concerns cited in the complaint from the communicants.
Such an omission seems to be a green light to Lawrence and his supporters to move forward with his plans. About a dozen parishes have indicated over the past two years that they might want to leave the Episcopal Church in the same way as St. Andrew's in Mount Pleasant did.
Read excellent Episcopal News Service report on Disciplinary Committee's decision
Lawrence anticipated the Board would charge him. For
nearly a year, Lawrence has predicted that the Church, and the
Presiding Bishop, in particular, would use the revised canon to give him
the boot. The Bishop and his supporters repeatedly suggested the revisions were designed to go after him.
It is not clear that Lawrence ever responded directly to the DBB about the complaints against him. He only defended himself briefly in a closed meeting with clergy, and then through surrogates who attacked the integrity and faith of the Presiding Bishop. There is no evidence that she had any involvement either with the complaints against him or the DBB's deliberations.
Henderson takes Lawrence at his word. Bishop Henderson's statement hinted that Bishop Lawrence's integrity and willingness to keep his word was a critical part of the DBB's discussions. He personally expressed his expectation that those in the Diocese who disagree with Lawrence would not be marginalized:
"It is ... significant that Bishop Lawrence has repeatedly stated that he does not intend to lead the diocese out of The Episcopal Church—that he only seeks a safe place within the Church to live the Christian faith as that diocese perceives it. I speak for myself only at this point, that I presently take the Bishop at his word, and hope that the safety he seeks for the apparent majority in his diocese within the larger Church will become the model for safety—a “safe place”—for those under his Episcopal care who do not agree with the actions of South Carolina’s convention and/or his position on some of the issues of the Church."
What about the Quitclaim deed business? The DBB apparently did not consider Lawrence's recent mass relinquishing of all Diocesan interests in parish properties. The unprecedented move, revealed only a few days before the DBB made its decision, makes it easier for individual parishes to leave the Episcopal Church.
Bishop Henderson's full statement
Episcopal News Service on complaints against Bishop Lawrence
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 13
Ga. Supreme Court Rejects Pawleys Island Decision, 6-1; Shoots Down Ugandans' Claim to Savannah's Christ Church (November 21, 2011)
Read ENS Report
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 12
"SC Diocese Releases Property Claim"
The Post & Courier, Charleston SC (Nov. 21, 2011)
by Adam Parker Read full story
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 11
Lawrence Allies Scramble to Record Deeds; Prudent Parishes Wary of Implications
(November 20, 2011)
Prudent vestries should review full implications
of quitclaim deeds before accepting them
"For God will bring every deed into judgment, even those done in secret …” Ecclesiastes
CHARLESTON -- Several parishes aligned with Bishop Mark Lawrence scrambled to record quitclaim deeds they received from the Diocese last week, even as questions swirled about their legality and the impact they could have on parishes who accept them.
Once the deeds are accepted by the parish or recorded publicly, they can’t be taken back.
Among those reportedly going forward last week were St. James Episcopal Church on James Island, Christ Episcopal Church in Mount Pleasant, The Church of the Good Shepherd and Holy Trinity Episcopal Church in West Ashley, The Cathedral of St. Luke & St. Paul, St. John’s Episcopal Church on Johns Island, St. Helena's in Beaufort, Trinity Episcopal Church in Myrtle Beach, The Episcopal Church of the Resurrection in Surfside Beach, and the Church of the Cross in Bluffton.
While SC Episcopalians is not a source of legal advice, we are hearing that more prudent vestries are planning to inform the Diocese that they are not accepting the quitclaim deed... until their lawyers, bankers, and insurance brokers have had a chance to assess its implications.
Every parish is different, and apparently every quitclaim deed issued by the Diocese is not the same. One size does not fit all.
The deeds, mailed out to the parishes last week, would relinquish any claim the Diocese might have on parish property should they be found to be valid. They could be seen by a parish as removing a potential obstacle to leaving the Episcopal Church, or they could lead to expensive and protracted litigation.
+++++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 10
Lawrence Quietly Initiated Plan to Give Away Diocesan Property Claims Two Years Ago (November 18, 2011)
2010 Deal with Bluffton parish was kept under wraps until Wednesday
Attacks on the Episcopal Church and Presiding Bishop were a smokescreen
BLUFFTON -- All the while claiming he was being loyal the Episcopal Church, SC Bishop Mark Lawrence was facilitating a possible departure from the Episcopal Church by a large parish in Bluffton nearly two years ago.
Apparently Lawrence and Standing Committee Chairman Jeffrey Miller quietly executed a "quitclaim deed" in February 2010, relinquishing the Diocese's legal interest in property belonging to the Church of the Cross. The deed wasn't recorded until Wednesday of this week.
Public disclosure of the deed's existence would have tipped off the rest of the Diocese and the Episcopal Church to Lawrence's plan to issue similar deeds to every parish in the Diocese this week. The Diocese's interest in the Bluffton property could be worth several million dollars.
During the same period the deed was being executed, Lawrence was publicly indignant over protests by traditional Episcopalians in the Diocese, who claimed he had violated his consecration oath to remain loyal to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.
Also at that same time, Bishop Lawrence and the Rev. Mr. Miller were actually denouncing Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori because the Episcopal Church was asking to see minutes of Standing Committee meetings and other legal documents that would have exposed their dealings with the Bluffton parish and others.
SC Episcopalians has been unable to find any evidence that the Bishop or the Standing Committee ever disclosed his generous gift to the Bluffton parish at either Diocesan convention held since that time.
+++++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 9
Anti-Episcopal Church Group Releases
Letter It Claims is from SC Chancellor
(November 18, 2011)
The American Anglican Council, one of several factions attacking the Episcopal Church, released a letter it claims has been sent to parishes in the Diocese of South Carolina from its Chancellor explaining Bishop Lawrence's recent actions relinquishing Diocesan interest in parish property.
If the letter is authentic, it is the first communication Bishop Lawrence has attempted with lay people in the matter. The group claims it went to every parish.
Read it here
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 8
Diocese of South Carolina Relinquishes
Claim to Parishes' Properties
(November 16, 2011 9 a.m.)
Attacks on the Episcopal Church and Presiding Bishop have largely been a smokescreen
Bishop's latest move would make it easier for parishes to leave the Episcopal Church
SEABROOK ISLAND -- Relying on a questionable and untested state Supreme Court ruling, Bishop Mark Lawrence announced Tuesday night that he is providing every parish in the Diocese a legal deed, permanently relinquishing any interest the Diocese may hold in its parish property.
This action could remove a potential stumbling block to parishes wanting to leave the Episcopal Church with their church property. It could also create chaos in the Diocese and among parishes, since the legality of the deeds may be in question.
The secret scheme has been in the works for at least two years, while Lawrence and others created public distractions with attacks on the Episcopal Church and the Presiding Bishop.
Lawrence's most recent outrage will almost certainly force the hand of Episcopal Church leaders, who have largely ignored his erratic, anti-Church behavior since becoming bishop in early 2008.
In the past Lawrence has insisted that the Diocese of South Carolina is “sovereign,” and argued that the wider Episcopal Church has no legal interest in parish property in the Diocese.
In the view of anti-Church secessionists, the way is now clear for parishes to leave the Episcopal Church in much the same way as St. Andrew's in Mount Pleasant did last year with Lawrence's apparent blessing.
Lawrence announced this latest provocation at a three-day clergy conference at the Diocese's conference center on Seabrook Island. As is his style, Lawrence’s carefully-scripted presentation was delivered in a closed-door setting surrounded by clergy and others who are least likely to challenge him.
The mood at the conference was "militant", according to one participant. Many clergy described themselves as being “at war" with the Episcopal Church, which they see as "the enemy."
Other more level-headed participants said they felt a great deal of pressure not to object to what was clearly an event orchestrated to create support for the Bishop's decision. Most the more traditional parishes in the Diocese were not represented at the conference.
Lawrence's legal thinking appeared to be the work of a Beaufort attorney, not especially well-known for his expertise in Church law. The Diocese's lawyer, Chancellor Wade Logan, was absent as he has been at other Diocesan events in which the attorney from Beaufort seemed to be in charge.
How important is this? It could be very important.
In the Episcopal Church, all property is held in trust for the use of its parishes by the Church and the dioceses. It can be a fuzzy arrangement, but it brings legal protections, better management and maintenance, enhanced borrowing capacity, and continuity from one generation to the next, among other things.
However, in the past, Lawrence has taken the position that the Episcopal Church does not have any interest in parish property in the Diocese, a position that directly contradicts dozens of state and Federal decisions on this question. The action the Bishop announced Tuesday evening means that he is renouncing any legal interest the Diocese might have in that property as well.
In short he is saying, that parishes own their own property and can do whatever they'd like with it, including taking it with them if they want to leave the Episcopal Church.
In his way of thinking, the Episcopal Church has no say in what happens to the property.
What difference will this make? Initially, parish life will continue as it always has, but an impact eventually could be felt when it comes to parishes borrowing money, securing insurance, inheriting property, recruiting clergy, providing pensions and employee benefits, and attracting new members.
In addition, many parishes receive annual income to maintain their buildings from endowments left to them to further the work of the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina. It is not clear if parishes could continue to use this money to maintain buildings in which the Diocese no longer has a legal interest.
Is this legal? For the moment, the Bishop's position may be uniquely valid in South Carolina. However, it is doubtful that it will withstand a legal challenge.
Here's why:
Three years ago, the state's Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of All Saints, Pawleys Island that seemed to suggest that the Episcopal Church -- and any other similarly structured church organization like the Presbyterians and Methodists -- does not have a legal interest in parish property held in trust by the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina.
All Saint's was trying to break away from the Episcopal Church and join the Anglican Province of Rwanda, which it eventually was allowed to do.
Legal authorities and those familiar with the Court's thinking say that the ruling was specific to the unique nature of All Saint's case. However, the Diocese of South Carolina, under Bishop Lawrence, disagrees.
Critical to the Court's ruling in the All Saints' case was a "quitclaim" deed executed by the Diocese in 1903 relinquishing any legal interest it might have to All Saints' property.
The existence of that deed tipped the Court's view of property ownership in favor of All Saints' over that of the Episcopal Church and the Diocese.
Bishop Lawrence told the clergy Tuesday that he has quietly executed similar "quitclaim" deeds for each parish in the Diocese.
Unfortunately, Lawrence’s action almost guarantees protracted legal battles. The SC Court's ruling, under which Lawrence is acting, appears to have no authority beyond South Carolina.
However, to have it declared invalid will likely require a Court challenge and appeal.
Last night's announcement will almost certainly accelerate an ongoing review of Lawrence's conduct by the Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops. That review was initiated by communicants in the Diocese who believe that the cumulative effect of Lawrence’s four turbulent years as our bishop amounts to a renunciation of his oath of loyalty to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.
Bishop Lawrence's supporters expect that the quitclaim deeds will make it easier for parishes in the Diocese to leave the Episcopal Church. Many are hoping they will choose to affiliate with the anti-Episcopal Church organization known as "The Anglican Church of North America."
ACNA operates under the leadership of Lawrence's mentor, deposed Pittsburgh Bishop Robert Duncan and his "Vicar General" in the Carolinas, former Episcopal priest Steve Wood. ACNA is not affiliated with the Episcopal Church and not part of the Anglican Communion.
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 7
Diocese Still Stoking Unfounded Fears of Episcopal Church Plot (November 10, 2011)
Standing Committee Chairman promotes imaginary threat at clergy gathering
Lawrence will make big announcement at
clergy conference
MYRTLE BEACH - On Thursday the Chairman of the Diocese's Standing Committee continued to suggest that the Episcopal Church is planning a move against our bishop, clergy, and parishes even though there is no evidence supporting such a claim.
The Rev. Paul Fuener told clergy from the Myrtle Beach area that all vestries need to begin studying their options, while the Diocese arranges for clergy to meet with representatives of the Church Pension Fund to learn about the status of their retirement savings.
Fuener said he believes the Episcopal Church has no choice but to go after the Diocese if it fails to repudiate all anti-Church resolutions passed at recent Diocesan conventions, especially those denying "accession" to the Church's Constitution and Canons.
In fact, no one in any position of authority in the Episcopal Church has ever suggested that such a course of action is contemplated. A spokesman for the Church's Executive Council said in September that its Constitution automatically deems rebellious actions like those taken by these conventions to be "null and void" and require no response.
Bishop planning a big announcement Wednesday. During his remarks Fuener hinted that Bishop Lawrence would have an important announcement on Wednesday morning toward the end of a scheduled Diocesan clergy conference.
Speculation is that the Bishop will say that he does not plan to contest charges that may or may not be made against him by the Church Disciplinary Board of Bishops. The Board is investigating complaints by communicants in the Diocese that Lawrence's actions as a bishop appear to violate his commitment to uphold the "doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church."
Under this scenario, Bishop Lawrence would argue that the Episcopal Church's newly-modified disciplinary canon is "unconstitutional" and thus he will refuse to be judged by the procedures established under it.
According to our information, Thursday's meeting was respectful and somber, except for a couple of anti-Church tirades by young right-wing clergy from Myrtle Beach.
Fortunately, an increasing number of Diocesan clergy are resisting the hysteria being generated by the Diocese and right-wing bloggers, and realize that they are in no danger of being thrown out of the Episcopal Church, nor are their parishes in any jeopardy.
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 6
Myrtle Beach Rector Jumps Ship for ACNA (November 10, 2011)
MYRTLE BEACH - The Rector of Trinity Episcopal Church in Myrtle Beach announced this week that he will join the controversial "Anglican Church of North America" in January as a church planter and theologian under the direction of former Episcopal priest, Steve Wood.
On Friday Bishop Lawrence expressed his sadness at losing The Reverend Rob Sturdy but said his move was "an exciting opportunity". Sturdy is one of the youngest rectors in the Diocese, and among the more outspoken right-wing critics of traditional Episcopalians.
ACNA is neither part of the Episcopal Church nor the Anglican Communion. It is not clear by what authority Lawrence is allowing Sturdy to continue to serve as a rector in the Diocese since he has, in effect, renounced the ordination vows he took less than four years ago.
In 2008 Sturdy became rector of Trinity in his mid-twenties just after his ordination, only slightly more than a year earlier. His surprising promotion was encouraged by former Bishop Edward Salmon, and was controversial because he lacked experience and, in the view of some, the maturity to lead such a large congregation . He had served briefly as parish's Curate even though he was just a deacon right out of seminary.
A number of traditional Episcopalians left the parish shortly thereafter. According to Sturdy, they were not comfortable with his focus on the Gospel and the Bible.
Sturdy will work under the direction of Mr. Wood at St. Andrew's in Mount Pleasant. Bishop Lawrence allowed the parish to leave the Episcopal Church last year and join the ACNA operation. The full financial arrangement between the Diocese and the parish over property were never made public.
In 2008 Mr. Wood told his congregation that the Presiding Bishop is the Anti-Christ, and he considers the Episcopal Church to be a "whore." He holds the title of "Vicar General" in the ACNA organization and oversees its presence in the Carolinas. Read more of this story
+++++
Church Membership Report Inspires Cheers & Worries in the Diocese of SC
(November 3, 2011)
Growth from 2000 to 2007 led all dioceses
Decline after 2007 led all dioceses as Sunday attendance dropped as well
Important new statistics on Episcopal Church membership and attendance from 2000 to 2010 provide news for the Diocese of South Carolina that is both encouraging and worrisome.
The best news is that the number of our baptized members grew by 9.5% between 2000 and 2010, making us one of only three dioceses to experience positive growth during the past decade. North Carolina was second behind us at 4.6%.
That means that as of 2010, there were 29,196 baptized Episcopalians in the Diocese of South Carolina, compared to 26,661 in 2000.
During that same period, membership in the Episcopal Church declined by more than 16%. As of 2010, there were 2.1 million Episcopalians in the world, compared to 2.4 million in 2000, a troubling decline that is comparable to that experienced by other mainline denominations.
However, an ominous concern for the Diocese of South Carolina is that it has been losing members since a high point in 2007. In fact, from 2009 to 2010, the Diocese of South Carolina lost seven percent of its membership, making it the leader among dioceses in declining membership.
One more curious bit of information ... While there may be more of us in the Diocese since 2000, we are not going to church as often. Over the past ten years, our average Sunday attendance (ASA) dropped five percent in spite of our substantial growth in membership.
From 2009-10, ASA in the Diocese declined by nearly 14%. Read entire report
+++++
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 5
Bishop will not Confirm New Members of St. Mark's Chapel (November 4, 2011)
Bishop reportedly cites "canonical, pastoral, & political dimensions"
PORT ROYAL -- Bishop Lawrence abruptly canceled a scheduled Confirmation at St. Mark's Chapel near Beaufort this Sunday. SC Episcopalians has no idea why this has happened. Learn about St. Mark's
St. Mark's is a group of former parishioners from St. Helena’s Episcopal Church in Beaufort who have attempted to establish a traditional Episcopal Church congregation in Port Royal near Beaufort. Critics of Bishop Lawrence have complained that he will not recognize them because of their loyalty to the Episcopal Church.
The Bishop's surprising decision was relayed to members of St. Mark's by way of an electronic communication from their clergy Friday. This is the relevant text from their message.
"Dear members and friends of St. Mark's Chapel,
"For reasons that go beyond the capabilities of email and to make a long story short, Confirmation of St. Mark's' confirmands is being postponed.
The Bishop will be with us for the 4 pm service which will include an opportunity for us to 'reaffirm our baptismal vows,' but no confirmations will take place. He says that there are canonical, pastoral and political dimensions to his decision and that we need to respect his thoughts on the subject. We look forward to seeing you at St. Mark's on Sunday.
"Please keep our confirmands in your prayers... May God bless us all! Thanks be to God. -- Jack Nietert and Scott Shafferormer"
_________
Bishop Duncan, "Anglican Diocese" Lose in Court ... again (October 18, 2011)
Breakaway parishes must negotiate with continuing Diocese for use of parish property
Pittsburgh -- Deposed Bishop Robert Duncan admitted defeat today as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in essence refused to allow parishes in the Diocese of Pittsburgh seeking to join Duncan’s ad-hoc "Anglican Diocese" to walk off with parish properties.
Instead, they will have to negotiate with the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh, if they want to continue to use them. The decision today, which conforms to others in breakaway dioceses, effectively ends a struggle for the property. Duncan issued a statement accepting the ruling. Read Duncan's statement
________
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 4
Diocese's Tactics Backfiring? (October 15, 2011)
Most parishes still supporting Bishop Lawrence, but not planning on leaving the Church
This week's hyperbolic response by the Diocese of South Carolina to a request for Standing Committee minutes by a Church lawyer may be a sign of the jitters among Diocesan leaders about a pending review of Bishop Mark Lawrence’s leadership.
While most clergy and lay people in the Diocese appear to support Bishop Lawrence, many are cautioning that there are limits to their support for the Bishop's ongoing "war" with Episcopal Church leaders. Bishop Lawrence's decision to make his case in the news media rather than responding to the Church's Disciplinary Board for Bishops does not appear to be winning him many converts either.
During the summer, several communicants of the Diocese submitted 63 pages of public records detailing Lawrence’s more controversial actions as Bishop to the Church’s Disciplinary Board and suggested they contain evidence of “abandonment of communion.”
Abandonment is a serious charge that could lead to a Bishop or priest being deposed.
Josephine Hicks, a Church attorney assisting the 18-member Board contacted the Diocese this week, requesting the minutes to assess the accuracy of the materials. In response, Diocesan leaders publicly challenged her authority, anti-Church bloggers attacked her character and motives, and others reportedly put pressure on her law firm. (Over the weekend Bishop Henderson announced that Ms. Hicks had withdrawn from matter because of conflicts in her law practice.)
Read Bishop Henderson's letter regarding Ms. Hicks
The commotion is similar to that created less than two years ago when the Diocese's former Chancellor was retained by the Episcopal Church and made a similar requests for documents. At that time, Lawrence famously described the request as an “incursion” by Church leaders into the “sovereign” Diocese of South Carolina and refused to hand over anything.
However, there may be a lot more than symbolic protest involved in the Diocese's refusal to allow the Disciplinary Board to see the minutes.
SC Episcopalians believes they will portray a Standing Committee acting largely as a rubber stamp for Lawrence and his advisers by approving schemes to provoke Church leaders and further alienate the Diocese from the Episcopal Church. They are also likely to give insight into the peculiar ease with which St. Andrew’s in Mount Pleasant was allowed leave the Episcopal Church last year with most of its property.
The minutes would also answer questions about Lawrence loyalists on the Standing Committee who reportedly served nearly nine months beyond the expiration of their terms in 2010. They also would contain recorded votes of clergy members on key actions that could be considered violations of their ordination oaths of loyalty to the "doctrine, discipline, and worship" of the Episcopal Church.
Meanwhile, over the past two days, SC Episcopalians has heard randomly from parishes around the Diocese, suggesting that they will continue to support the Bishop at this point, but that support does not necessarily include leaving the Episcopal Church.
Courts throughout the country are continuing to side with the Episcopal Church in cases where parishioners have tried to the leave the Church with their property. Clergy as well have their own issues to address, should they leave the Episcopal Church for one that may not have the same employment opportunities or benefits.
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 3
Bishop Henderson Cools Diocese's Frenzied
Blitz of the News Media (October 13, 2011)
The former Bishop of Upper South Carolina and current chairman of the Disciplinary Board reviewing complaints against Bishop Mark Lawrence sounded a calming tone Tuesday after spokesmen for the Diocese launched a frenzied blitz of the news media.
In brief written statement, retired Bishop Dorsey Henderson outlined his Board's review process as prescribed by the Church's Constitution, and stressed that none of its members had formed any opinions about the complaints against Bishop Lawrence. He also said that Lawrence was welcome to respond to the complaints as extensively as he would like.
Henderson's statement read:
"The Disciplinary Board is only in the earliest stages of its work and has not reached any decision regarding the credibility of the information received or whether the actions and conduct reported actually constitute abandonment. It has made no 'charges' of any kind; neither has any other part or structure of The Episcopal Church.
"The Disciplinary Board will, by the grace of God and with diligence, proceed methodically, carefully, prayerfully—and confidentially—to meet its canonical responsibility, including a request for, and consideration of, any and all input that Bishop Lawrence wishes to be considered.
"The President of the Disciplinary Board has provided Bishop Lawrence with all of the information it has received and is under consideration, and will continue to do so."
Henderson issued his statement after the Diocese's spin machine went into overdrive accusing the Church of plotting to depose Lawrence and "attack" the diocese and its parishes. Click here for Bishop Henderson's comments.
Diocesan Meltdown: Part 2
Bishop Lawrence's Defense Does Little to Inspire Worried Clergy
(October 12, 2011)
Diocesan Leadership seemed "detached and delusional" at closed-door meeting of clergy
Diocese uses meeting to launch frenzied
media blitz
JAMES ISLAND -- Mark Lawrence headed to the site of his election as Bishop of South Carolina more than four years ago to defend himself against complaints that he has failed to adhere to his consecration oath to conform to the “doctrine, discipline, and, worship of the Episcopal Church.”
In a three-hour, private meeting with Diocesan clergy on Tuesday, Bishop Lawrence sometimes angrily responded to each of twelve complaints about his leadership currently under review by a disciplinary board of fellow bishops, clergy, and lay people from throughout the Church.
The Bishop told the gathering that he was staying with the Episcopal Church “for now,” but could not “tell what the future would bring,” according to a participant in the audience. The gathering was held at St. James' Episcopal Church on James Island.
Most of the meeting was reportedly a rambling monologue by the Bishop, followed by a carefully-orchestrated series of speakers determined to put an hysterical spin on the inquiry.
Beaufort Lawyer Alan Runyan followed Lawrence, suggesting, without any evidence, that the Church was proceeding on a "fast track" to depose Lawrence as a prelude to "attacks" on the diocese and its parishes. According to the Diocese's news release, the "picture painted was an ugly one of expensive litigation, confrontation and acrimony in which all involved significantly lost."
The Reverend Jeffrey Miller, past president of the Standing Committee stated during the gathering, “The question is not whether we can stay; it is whether they will let us stay and follow what we believe.”
In fact, there is nothing to suggest that the Episcopal Church will not allow churchmen like Bishop Lawrence and Mr. Miller to remain Episcopalians and follow what they believe. None of the complaints being considered by the disciplinary board have anything to do with Lawrence's beliefs or those of Mr. Miller.
Some who were present described at Tuesday's meeting described the overall content of the presentations Tuesday as "paranoid" and "delusional".
They also observed that the Bishop's comments "were not remotely pastoral", and seemed devoid of concern for the impact of his actions on younger clergy or the parishes. Bishop Lawrence is fully vested in the Church's retirement fund, and likely would have little trouble finding employment, if he wanted to continue working.
Former SC Bishop Fitz Allison spoke toward the end of the meeting to rally the spirits of group. According to one clergyman who had sat through the session, "It was definitely needed."
Since Lawrence's consecration, the Presiding Bishop and other bishops have tried to reach out to Lawrence and the Diocese repeatedly, even as their rhetoric and hostility toward the Church became more pronounced.
In 2008, former SC Bishop Ed Salmon told the House of Bishops that Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori "bent over backwards" to help Lawrence when his election as Bishop of South Carolina was in trouble.
However, the Diocese took little note of her support.
Shortly after her installation, the Presiding Bishop made a three-day trip to the Diocese expressly to listen to the concerns of Lawrence and the clergy.
On that visit, she was famously treated with disrespect, including being publicly labeled "The Anti-Christ" by the rector of one of her host parishes. The same rector later referred to the Episcopal Church as a "whore".
Not only did the Bishop make no apparent effort to discipline the rector in question, but he later provided what he calls "a generous pastoral response" in facilitating the departure of the rector, his parish, and most of its property from the Episcopal Church.
Since that visit, the rantings of the Diocese have largely been ignored over the years, even though Diocesan leaders claimed the Church leaders were at "war" with them.
However, over the past two years, the Bishop and Standing Committee continued to bait Church leaders in ways that can not be ignored.
Over the past year, they urged successive Diocesan conventions to rewrite the Diocese's governing documents in ways that would place conditions on the Diocese's "accession" to the Episcopal Church's Constitution and Canons. A diocese can not place "qualifications" on accession and remain a member of the Episcopal Church.
The Diocesan Constitution was successfully amended in February by the 2011 Diocesan Convention and that was significant enough to trigger complaints from within the Diocese that include eleven other instances where the Bishop's conduct may have violated his oath of loyalty to the Church.
Read the Diocese's version of this story by clicking here.
_____________
Diocesan Meltdown: Part I
The Episcopal Church Reviewing Complaints about SC Bishop's Leadership
(October 5, 2011)
Do Bishop Lawrence's acts of rebellion constitute "abandonment of Communion"?
Inquiry generated by complaints from within the Diocese, Bishop Lawrence calls for a closed-door meeting to rally the clergy
A disciplinary committee of bishops has begun a formal inquiry into the rocky leadership of SC Bishop Mark Lawrence, including his engineering a revision of that part of the Diocese's Constitution essential for membership in the Episcopal Church.
The review could lead to formal charges against the Bishop, if there is sufficient evidence to show that his actions are a violation his consecration oath and authority as a bishop in the Church.
Bishop Lawrence and the Diocese's Standing Committee have repeatedly challenged the authority of the Episcopal Church over the past four years, but have largely been ignored in that their actions were meaningless.
However, over the past year, the Bishop has encouraged the Standing Committee and delegates to successive Diocesan conventions to rewrite the Diocese's governing documents in ways that would place conditions on the Diocese's "accession" to the Episcopal Church's Constitution and Canons.
That was achieved in February at the 2011 Diocesan Convention and was significant enough to trigger complaints from within the Diocese that include eleven other instances where the Bishop's conduct may have violated his oath of loyalty to the Church.
Bishop Lawrence was informed of the inquiry first in a phone call and then in a letter from The Rt. Rev. Dorsey Henderson, former Bishop of the Diocese of Upper South Carolina and current President of the Episcopal Church’s 19-member Disciplinary Committee.
According to Henderson, communicants in the Diocese have complained about Lawrence's actions, and asked that they be reviewed to determine if they constituted “abandonment of communion." He stressed that his Committee's inquiry was not initiated by Church leaders or the Presiding Bishop.
Every bishop and priest in the Episcopal Church takes an oath to “uphold the doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church.” Abandonment occurs when a bishop or priest violates that oath.
Accession means that a Diocese agrees that the authority of its Constitution is superseded by that of the Episcopal Church when the two are in conflict. Last February's Diocesan convention reversed that relationship, claiming that the Diocese has the final word.
"Unqualified accession" is essential for a Diocese to belong to the Episcopal Church, in much the same way as states belong to the United States. Lawrence claims that the "accession" requirement only applies to dioceses created after the Church was founded. As a founding member of the Episcopal Church, he says that the Diocese of South Carolina is exempt.
Other issues related to abandonment include the Bishop’s ordination of his son as an Episcopal priest even though he had been ordained as a deacon in another denomination, his insistence that the Diocese is “sovereign”, and his insistence that the Episcopal Church has no legal claim to Episcopal Church property in the Diocese.
Click here to read the 63-page complaint.
Bishop Lawrence also received a separate letter from Church Attorney Josephine Hicks from Charlotte requesting copies of minutes from Standing Committee meetings and records of the ordination of the Bishop’s son.
Click here to read Ms. Hicks' letter
Instead of simply providing the documents that might disprove the "abandonment" charge, the Bishop has called for a closed-door meeting of Diocesan clergy to rally them to his cause.
Click here to learn more about the specific complaints against Bishop Lawrence from Episcopal News Service
_________
SC Diocese Rejects Church's View that its Actions are "Null and Void" (September 28, 2011)
Diocese sticks to dubious claim that its rejection
of "accession" to the National Church's Constitution is legal
The Diocese of South Carolina reasserted today that its Constitution is not subject to that of the Episcopal Church because of its status as a founding diocese of the Church.
In a letter to the Secretary of the Church's Executive Council, Bishop Lawrence and Standing Committee Chairman Paul Fuener disputed a determination this summer by the Council's Joint Standing Committee on Governance and Administration that the Diocese's recent actions, removing accession to the Church's Constitution, are "null and void." (See article below).
The back-and-forth between the Diocese and Church officials was generated by an inquiry last spring from Charleston Attorney Melinda Lucka and other SC Episcopalians, questioning the legitimacy of the Diocese's actions.
Click here to see the Diocese's entire response.
_______________
Episcopal Church tells Diocese that Recent Changes to its Constitution are Meaningless (September 21, 2011)
Removal of Access Clause is "null and void"
An official of the Episcopal Church informed Bishop Mark Lawrence this month that recent changes made to the Constitution of the Diocese of South Carolina are “null and void” in the eyes of the Episcopal Church.
Last February delegates to the 2011 Diocesan Convention gave final approval to amendments to the Diocese’s governing document eliminating “accession” to the Episcopal Church's Constitution.
Accession means that a Diocese agrees that the national Church’s Constitution supersedes that of the Diocese when they are in conflict. The actions of the Convention, approved and supported by the Bishop and Standing Committee, would have reversed that relationship.
According to the Secretary of the Church’s Executive Council, members of its Joint Standing Committee on Governance and Administration determined over the summer that the actions of the Diocesan Convention are sufficiently similar to those taken by rebellious Dioceses of Quincy, San Joaquin, Pittsburgh, and Fort Worth in previous years as to be covered by the same 2007 Executive Council Resolution (NAC023) that declared them meaningless.
The Resolution specifically states that “any diocesan amendment that purports in any way to limit or lessen an unqualified accession to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church are null and void, as if such amendments had not been passed.”
It goes further to say that this determination is applicable, not just to those four dioceses, but any other dioceses that take “steps or have adopted amendments that purport in any way to limit or lessen unqualified accession to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church”.
In short, once a diocese commits to join the Episcopal Church, it has no authority to leave. Individual clergy and lay people can leave, but a diocese as a corporate entity can’t.
Bishop Lawrence, who claims the Diocese of South Carolina is “sovereign”, has argued that the Diocese wasn’t “intending” to leave the Church, even though he and the Standing Committee were fully aware that accession to the Church’s Constitution is essential to membership.
The underlying issue here is the ownership of Episcopal Church property in the Diocese, specifically the property of parishes that might want to leave the Episcopal Church. The Bishop and the Standing Committee of the Diocese argue that they alone have the authority to decide what happens to it.
(These controversial amendments are probably also meaningless since the Diocese appears to have violated its own Constitution and Canons to re-convene the 2010 Diocesan Convention to adopt them. Read more)
__________
ABC likely to Announce Early Retirement Next Year (September 19, 2011)
Right-wing Anglicans want new ABC to replace the Episcopal Church in the Anglican Communion
Early money is on the Archbishop of York and maybe the Bishop of London
Numerous news sources in London confirm that Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams is ready to call it quits next year. Williams is widely considered scholarly, brilliant, and hugely inept in the face of right-wing attempts to split the worldwide Anglican Communion apart.
The Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, is considered the likely choice to succeed Williams, who is reported to be considering a teaching position at Cambridge.
Sentamu is a native of Uganda, considered slightly more conservative than Williams, and proven particularly adept at navigating the tricky politics of the Anglican Communion. The drawback to Sentamu is that he is older than Rowan Williams.
Click here to learn more about Archbishop Sentamu.
However, Sentamu is not universally popular, leading some to speculate that a dark horse candidate, like Richard Chartes, Bishop of London since 1995, might get the nod. Chartes is a close friend of Prince Charles. (He also has white hair and a beard, so he may already looks the part.)
Right-wing Primates and their American allies are hoping that the appointment of a new, more conservative ABC would result in the expulsion of the Episcopal Church from the Anglican Communion.
When Williams retires, the Prime Minister will propose two names to the Queen, and she will select one. The British Monarch is actually the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
In selecting ABCs in the past Queen Elizabeth generally has veered more toward the choice favored by the Prime Minister.
___________
NEW! Former SC Bishop to Lead Nashotah House Seminary
(June 29, 2011) click here
____________
House of Bishops Still Trying to Get Answers from Lawrence, SC Diocese
(March 23, 2011)
FLAT ROCK, NC -- This month the Episcopal Church’s House of Bishops is scheduled to meet at Kanuga, where SC Bishop Mark Lawrence will most likely be asked again by his colleagues to explain what the heck the Diocese of South Carolina is doing. SC Episcopalians has learned that many, if not most, bishops are exasperated with Lawrence, who they say has been evasive and vague about what the Diocese wants.
Last month the Diocesan Convention, at Lawrence’s instigation, voted to abolish its legal ties to the Episcopal Church. Last fall Lawrence and another convention proclaimed themselves to be “sovereign,” whatever that means.
Lawrence has burned bridges with a number of the most senior bishops who voted to consent to his election in 2007, after he promised them he would not try to lead the Diocese out of the Episcopal Church. Several of them even pressured their Standing Committees to consent when some of their members doubted Lawrence's sincerity.
______________
Texas Secessionists Out of Options
as Another Court backs the Episcopal Church
(March 17, 2011)
Legal victories for the Episcopal Church add up, as the position of Diocese of SC becomes increasingly untenable
The Texas Court of Appeals in Austin has sustained a lower court order awarding the property belonging to an Episcopal Church in San Angelo to the Diocese and the continuing vestry and parishioners. The Court rejected the claims of secessionist members of the congregation.
Although there may yet be an appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, this is a big win for the Diocese of NW Texas. It bolsters the legal theory that Episcopal Church property belongs to the Episcopal Church and those duly constituted dioceses governed by its Constitution and Canons.
The opinion also approves the trial court's application of "Neutral Principals of Law" by including the canons of the Episcopal Church and the Diocese among the governing documents applicable to property ownership.
Read the opinion
____________
"Enthusiastic" Episcopalians Celebrate Traditions and the Future of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina (March 12, 2011)
NORTH CHARLESTON --Traditional Episcopalians rallied Saturday in North Charleston at an all-day conference that had the upbeat look and feel of Diocesan conventions of years ago. Nearly 300 people attended the event that included an illustrious panel of speakers including Bonnie Anderson, the President of the Episcopal Church’s House of Deputies.
The Episcopal Forum of SC, organizer of the “Enthusiastically Episcopalian” conference, intentionally structured the event such that it did not appear to be a reaction to the recent annual convention of the Diocese at which delegates voted to sever legal ties with the Episcopal Church.
The Forum sees its role as promoting the doctrine, discipline, and worship of the Episcopal Church in South Carolina. Barbara Mann, president of the Forum said that Saturday's event was an opportunity for SC Episcopalians to remain connected to the mainstream of life in the Church.
Indeed, participants on Saturday seemed to represent all parts of the Diocese. Many said that the trip to North Charleston was worth it if only to experience the traditional worship of the Episcopal Church, and hear encouraging news of the work of the Church around the world.
The Rev. Canon Michael Wright, rector of Grace Episcopal Church in Charleston, led the morning Eucharist that included a full choir and a congregation filled with more bishops, clergy, and lay leaders than have ever participated in such an event.
Click here to visit Forum website
________________
Diocesan Convention Finalizes Attempt to Secede from National Church,
as Enthusiasm for Bishop's Agenda Cools (February 19, 2011, rev. March 4)
Lawrence says we're not leaving, but urges actions that dissolve our legal ties anyway
Deepening financial crisis shows support for the Diocese has eroded; Revenues from parishes declines 21% over two years
The quixotic journey of the Diocese of South Carolina to distance itself from the Episcopal Church reached another dubious milestone Saturday as delegates to its 2012 Convention claimed to have finalized repudiation of its national Constitution and Canons.
The move puts into play
legal issues around the status of its parishes in the Episcopal Church and
their claim to own Episcopal Church property.
In order to belong to the Episcopal Church, accession to its governance is essential in the same way as states are subject to Federal laws. If dioceses or parishes fail to do so, they are not legally considered in the Episcopal Church and can not hold property belonging to the Church.
With a straight face Saturday, Bishop Lawrence told the convention that he
hoped that the Diocese now “would be free from constitutional and canonical
challenges from the ‘national’ leadership of the Episcopal Church … Only time
will tell if we will be permitted to do our work unencumbered by intrusions.”
The Diocese's position is that it is now not obligated to follow any of the canons that govern the Episcopal Church and that it will abide by the Church's Constitution only in instances in which it does not conflict with the Constitution of the Diocese.
Essentially the newly revised Article I of the Diocesan Constitution reads, we will follow the Constitution of the Episcopal Church except when we don't want to.
______________Legal Case for Secessionists in Fort Worth Implodes (January 24, 2011)
A Texas Judge has ruled that would-be secessionists in the Diocese of Fort Worth, who say they have realigned themselves with another Anglican province, have no claim to Episcopal Church property. The ruling against former Bishop Jack Iker and his anti-Episcopal Church supporters is in line with decisions being reached in almost every similar case in the country.
The ruling against Iker, an ally of former SC Bishop Edward Salmon and Bishop Lawrence, does not directly affect the current peculiar efforts of the Diocese of South Carolina to distance itself from the National Church.
However, it is a further reminder that judges around the country are not buying the argument that there is a legal justification for a diocese to consider itself "sovereign." Such a claim effectively denies that the Episcopal Church has any legal interest in Church property within the borders of the Diocese.
Lawrence and his Standing Committee convinced delegates to a gathering of parish leaders last fall to approve a resolution making such a claim.
SC Episcopalians continues to believe that the gathering, which the Diocese claims was a legitimate extension of its 2010 Diocesan Convention last April, was not authorized by its Constitution and Canons. We further maintain that as many as one-third of the members of the Standing Committee at the time were serving illegally.
Read full story
__________
Reconvened Convention Approves Changes Allowing Possible Secession from the National Church
(October 15, 2010, revised October 19, 2010)
Presiding Bishop "grieves" that Lawrence and his supporters misinterpreted her "concern... as aggression"
The
re-convened
2010 Annual Convention of the Diocese of South Carolina,
convinced that the leadership of the Episcopal Church is out to get its bishop, easily approved six controversial resolutions
altering the Diocese's Constitution and Canons as a prelude to a potential departure from its national Church next spring.
Delegates left the convention unsure about exactly what they had done, but convinced that whatever they did was the right thing. Some thought they'd voted to leave the national Church. Others said they'd voted to leave the Church next March, while still others insisted they did nothing that would change the relationship of the Diocese to the Episcopal Church.
Many delegates appeared to believe rumors that national Church leaders are trying to depose Bishop Lawrence. SC Episcopalians has tried to track down the source of those rumors without success.
One delegate representing a traditional Episcopal parish described as "fantasy" Diocesan leaders' depiction of the attitude of national Church toward the Diocese.
Since 2003, the Diocese has imagined itself to be in some kind of "war' with Church leaders, after a majority of dioceses & bishops consented to the election of a gay man as a bishop.
Delegates left the convention unsure about exactly what they had done, but convinced that whatever they did was the right thing. Some thought they'd voted to leave the national Church. Others said they'd voted to leave the Church next March, while still others insisted they did nothing that would change the relationship of the Diocese to the Episcopal Church.
Many delegates appeared to believe rumors that national Church leaders are trying to depose Bishop Lawrence. SC Episcopalians has tried to track down the source of those rumors without success.
One delegate representing a traditional Episcopal parish described as "fantasy" Diocesan leaders' depiction of the attitude of national Church toward the Diocese.
Since 2003, the Diocese has imagined itself to be in some kind of "war' with Church leaders, after a majority of dioceses & bishops consented to the election of a gay man as a bishop.
When she was informed of the convention's actions, Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said "I grieve these actions, but I especially grieve Bishop Lawrence's perception of my heartfelt concern for him and for the people of South Carolina as aggression. I don't seek to change his faithfully held positions on human sexuality, nor do I seek to control the inner workings of the diocese."
The most troubling part of the convention to observers was the apparent lack of understandable legal guidance for the delegates.
The Bishop has recently relied on Alan Runyon, a lawyer from Beaufort to articulate the Diocese's position on key issues, including revisions to the Church's disciplinary procedures. Mr. Runyon is the legal counsel to the Standing Committee, and frequently spoke to the delegates with some authority about his interpretation of the resolutions.
The Diocesan Chancellor Wade Logan was not in attendance, but in comments to SC Episcopalians after the convention Bishop Lawrence emphatically rejected rumors that he had lost confidence in him in favor of Mr. Runyon.
The Bishop dismissed such speculation as "sheer nonsense," professing full confidence in Mr. Logan, a well-respected attorney from Charleston.
Traditional Episcopalians watching the convention felt Lawrence and other diocesan officials appeared to have been carefully prepped on what to say and not say about leaving the Episcopal Church.
Click here to read the rest of this SC Episcopalians' story
Read Episcopal Cafe's full story
_______________
of October 15th Re-Convention (October 8, 2010)
In a letter to Bishop Lawrence, we asked him by what authority he and the Standing Committee are trying to re-convene delegates to a convention that was over seven months ago. We also don't get how several members of the Standing Committee are still serving nine months after their terms expired.
Read the entire letter
_________
Loyal S.C. Episcopalians Urge National Church to Investigate the Diocese of South Carolina; Lawrence Responds
(September 25, 2010)
Episcopal Forum claims Lawrence has violated his vows and failed to protect Church property
Diocese mushes forward toward illegal Oct. 15th
Re-convention
Loyal Episcopalians in the Diocese of South Carolina this week pleaded with national Church leaders to formally investigate the current efforts of Bishop Mark Lawrence and his Standing Committee to effectively sever ties between the Diocese and the Episcopal Church.
In a dramatic letter to the Church's Executive Council and House of Bishops, the Episcopal Forum of South Carolina claims that Lawrence has abdicated his obligations as bishop in the Church by failing to act against parishes in rebellion, particularly in the case of St. Andrew's. Mt. Pleasant.
The organization claims that Lawrence's goal is the “alienation and disassociation of the Diocese of South Carolina from the Episcopal Church."
Earlier this month Lawrence, who maintains the Diocese is “sovereign," asked delegates to last spring's Annual Convention to reconvene on October 15th and ratify six resolutions that effectively repeal the critical “accession” clause in the Diocesan Constitution, a requirement for membership in the Episcopal Church.
Without such a clause, a diocese forfeits it right to own Episcopal Church property and leaves the status of its clergy as Episcopal priests in limbo.
On Friday, Lawrence issued a response to the Forum’s accusations. His comments were more evasive than specific, except that he made clear that he is putting all his marbles on a recent oddball ruling by the S.C. Supreme Court that seemed to deny the legal status of the Episcopal Church as “hierarchical.”
Without such status, it is arguable that the national Church can not lay claim to the assets of a diocese of parishes that choose to leave the Church.
_________________
Commentary: Anglican Smack-Down
by Diana Butler Bass
(June 9, 2010)
What does the latest missive from the Archbishop of Canterbury mean to us, if anything? Celebrated church historian and commentator breaks it down for the rest of us. full story
__________________
Convention Rallies to Bishop's Shadowbox "War"; Financial and Constitutional Challenges Loom (March 25, 2010)
Delegates
to Friday's Diocesan Convention in Summerville rallied behind Bishop Mark Lawrence in
his ongoing “war” against the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church
and its long-time lawyer, Chancellor David Beers. During the entire six-hour convention, not a single question was raised
about the Diocese's deepening financial challenges or how it will address
the most serious assault on its Constitution in its
350-year history. full story
__________________To
no one's surprise, St.
Andrew's in Mount Pleasant formally voted on Sunday to sever its ties
with the Episcopal Church. In preparation last summer, the congregation
took legal steps to try to take its property with them. The parish's
theology and politics have not
been particularly "Episcopal" or "Anglican" for years.
full story
full story
________________
Lawrence Sandbags Church Leaders over Rebel Parishes; Postpones 2010 Diocesan Convention (February 12, 2010)
full story
_____________
